Abstract:Food consumers often query or ignore the risk assessments of scientists, the food industry and public bodies. This is widely acknowledged. It has been suggested that this ‘expert-lay discrepancy’ is a relatively straightforward upshot of the fact that lay people lack the knowledge and technical understanding of experts. However, much published research on risk in psychology and sociology runs counter to this ‘knowledge deficit’ model (Hansen et al., 2003). In many cases, at least, lay risk assessments are not well explained as the product of ignorance, because they are in fact complex, situational sensitive expressions of a person's value system. There is obviously a pressing need today to understand expert-lay discrepancies in the assessment of food risks. We need to know how consumers perceive and assess risks; why they respond to communication and advice relating to those risks in the way they do; what factors affect their willingness to trust public institutions responsible for regulating the food industry and issuing guidance on food matters; and what determines their handling of specific food hazards. Psychometric and psychological studies of risk perception offer an invaluable corrective to excessive and simplistic reliance on the deficit model (Fife et al., 2000; Hansen et al., 2003). By emphasising the multi-dimensionality of lay risk perception, they have improved the understanding of expert-lay discrepancy. More generally, the demonstration that risks and benefits are not perceived independently of each other is a crucial finding of psychological research, and we now know that risk-benefit analyses that treat risk and benefits as independent factors should be handled with caution by those aiming to interpret or influence popular opinion. Our paper is an attempt to analyse consumers’ behaviour when facing a potential risky action such as consuming GM food. The hypothesis tested states that consumers take into account both costs (accident) and benefits (rewards) of uncertain outcomes and then minimize risk instead of trying to totally avoid it. A sample of 338 students, interviewed in year 2000 (188) and in year 2008 (150), enrolled in different Italian colleges was directly interviewed on an hypothetical genetically modified tomato market. A mixture distributions was used first for inferring on what variables influence the decision to take part on the "new market" proposed and, second, to estimate the Willingness To Pay (WTP) distribution for those willing to buy the GM product proposed.

Consumers' Risk Perception of Triploid Food: Empirical Research Based on Variance Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling

Measuring Consumer Heterogeneous Preferences for Pork Traits under Media Reports: Choice Experiment in Sixteen Traceability Pilot Cities, China

Area Diversity Analysis of Consumer Conception of Vegetable Quality Safety and Purchase Behavior

Trust and Consumer Confidence in the Safety of Dairy Products in China

Are Social Embeddedness Associated with Food Risk Perception under Media Coverage?

Genetically Modified Rice: Do Chinese Consumers Support or Go Against It? Based on the Perspectives of Perceived Risk and Trust

Female Responses to Genetically Modified Foods: Effects of the Menstrual Cycle and Food Risk Concerns

Does Information Pattern Affect Risk Perception of Food Safety? A National Survey in China

Consumers' Trust in Government and Their Attitudes Towards Genetically Modified Food: Empirical Evidence from China

Understanding the Factors Driving Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Gene-Edited Foods in China

Social Trust and Risk Perception of Genetically Modified Food in Urban Areas of China: the Role of Salient Value Similarity

The Effects of Epistemic Trust and Social Trust on Public Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food: An Empirical Study from China

Developing Food Consumer Attitudes towards Ionizing Radiation and Genetic Modification

A Consumer Segmentation Study with Regards to Genetically Modified Food in Urban China

How to Improve Risk Perception Evaluation in Food Safety: A Psychometric Approach

Issues surrounding consumer trust and acceptance of existing and emerging food processing technologies

Public Perceptions of Food Safety: Assessing the RisksPosed by Genetic Modification, Irradiation, Pesticides,Microbiological Contamination and High Fat/High CalorieFoods

Consumers' Perceptions on GM Food Safety in Urban China

Impacts of knowledge and trust on consumer perceptions and purchase intentions towards genetically modified foods

Study of the Correlation between Streaming Video Platform Content on Food Production Processes and the Behavioral Intentions of Generation Z