Electrokinetic Enhancement of Water Flux and Ion Rejection through Graphene Oxide/Carbon Nanotube Membrane
Haiguang Zhang,Xie Quan,Shuo Chen,Hongtao Yu,Junfeng Niu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05254
2020-11-16
Abstract:Graphene oxide (GO) is promising for constructing next-generation high-performance membranes for water treatment and desalination. However, GO-based membranes are still subjected to low ion rejection or limited water flux. Herein, the electrokinetic effect is employed as a new strategy for the coenhancement of water flux and ion rejection through an ethylenediamine–polystyrenesulfonate intercalated graphene oxide/carbon nanotube (GO&EDA-PSS/CNT) asymmetric membrane. Benefiting from the external voltage applied across the GO&EDA-PSS layer, the electrokinetically driven water transport velocity is significantly increased from 0 to 23.7 μm s<sup>–1</sup> with increasing the voltage from 0 to 3.0 V. As a result, the water flux is improved from 9.1 to 17.4 L m<sup>–2</sup> h<sup>–1</sup> under a transmembrane pressure of 1 bar. Simultaneously, the rejection rate for NaCl is increased from 52.4% to 78.3%. Numerical analysis reveals that the increased rejection rate is attributed to the electrokinetic enhancements of water transport through the membrane and ion partitioning between the membrane and bulk solution. These results indicate that the assistance of the electrokinetic effect is an effective means to improve membrane filtration performance, which provides a new perspective on the design of advanced membranes for achieving high water flux and rejection efficiency.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.est.0c05254?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.0c05254</a>.Detailed calculation methods, diagram of membrane module and filtration setup, thicknesses of the membrane, EDS mapping analysis, XPS spectra, FTIR band assignments and atomic ratios, pure water fluxes and Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and NaCl rejection rates of the membranes, ζ potentials, <i>I</i>–<i>t</i> curves and linear sweep voltammetry curve, membrane cathode potentials (V vs SCE), pH of the permeate and retentate solutions, fluxes and PEG<sub>1000</sub> rejections, fluxes and NaCl rejections, calculation models and the simulated fluid velocity profiles, calculated charge quantities and volume charge densities, simulated ion concentration profiles, energy consumptions of membrane filtration processes, and additional figures and tables (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.est.0c05254/suppl_file/es0c05254_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
environmental sciences,engineering, environmental