Abstract:Background: To what extent does junior athletic performance predict senior athletic performance (i.e., in the highest, open-age category)? This question is the subject of a lively debate in the literature. Following traditional theories of giftedness and expertise, some researchers and practitioners have proposed that a high level of junior performance is a prerequisite for the development of a high level of later senior performance. Sceptics of this view hold that junior performance has limited predictive value for later senior performance, pointing to empirical evidence indicating that predictors (e.g., participation patterns) of junior performance and of senior performance differ. The straightforward way to resolve this controversy empirically is to test the correlation between junior and senior performance. Objective: To provide robust and generalizable evidence on this issue, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies. The aim was to quantify the overall correlation between junior and senior performance and then test whether correlations vary across junior age categories and subsamples (e.g., types of sports). Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in SPORTDiscus, Eric, ProQuest, PsychInfo, PubMed, Scopus, WorldCat, and Google Scholar from 27 January through 30 April 2022. We searched for original studies that recorded athletes' junior and senior performance longitudinally and included measures of association between junior and senior performance. Quality of evidence was evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool version for nonrandomized studies. Results: The search yielded k = 129 effect sizes from N = 13,392 athletes from a wide range of Olympic sports, 62% male and 38% female, from 2006 to 2021. Four central findings emerged: (1) Overall, the meta-analytic pooled correlation between junior and senior performance was [Formula: see text] = 0.148. That is, junior performance explained only 2.2% of the reliable variance in senior performance. (2) The finding was robust across types of sports, sexes, wider or narrower performance ranges, national or international samples, and binary or continuous performance measures. (3) Effects varied across junior age categories: the younger the junior age category, the lower the correlation between junior and senior performance, with [Formula: see text] ranging from [Formula: see text] = - 0.052 to [Formula: see text] = 0.215. That is, across junior age categories, junior performance explained 0-4.6% of the reliable variance in senior performance. (4) The quality of primary studies was high. Discussion: The results suggest that junior performance has very little, if any, predictive value for senior performance. The findings run counter to claims from traditional theories of both giftedness and expertise. From an applied perspective, talent selection typically begins around puberty or younger-age ranges where youth performance is uncorrelated or negatively correlated with later senior performance. The evidence presented here raises serious questions about the use of junior performance for talent selection purposes. A PRISMA-P protocol was registered at https://osf.io/gck4a/ .

The Meta Analysis of Relative Age Effect on the Identification and Development of Athlete Talents

How to Compare Relative Age Effect in Different Sports? A New Methodological Approach-Example of Youth Olympic Games

Influences of competition level, gender, player nationality, career stage and playing position on relative age effects

Exploring Relative Age Effects in Youth Ice Hockey Through a Single Team Case Study and Composite Narratives

Quantifying the Extent to Which Junior Performance Predicts Senior Performance in Olympic Sports: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

A proposed theoretical model to explain relative age effects in sport

Mitigating against relative age effects in youth Track & Field: Validating corrective adjustment procedures across multiple events

Relative age effect presence among swimmers within Youth Olympic Games

Leveling the Playing Field: A New Proposed Method to Address Relative Age- and Maturity-Related Bias in Soccer

From Junior to Elite in Soccer: Exploring the Relative Age Effect and Talent Selection in Spanish Youth National Teams

The interaction of relative age with maturation and body size in female handball talent selection based on only sport-specific criteria

The prevalence of relative age effects and the influence of the talent pool size on Australian male and female youth football

Structural analysis of environmental factors of sports talent development

Talent Identification and Development in Youth Sports: A Systematic Review

Effects of Early Talent Promotion on Junior and Senior Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Scientific production on the relative age effect in sport: bibliometric analysis of the last 9 years (2015-2023)

The relative age effect and its influence on athletic performance in Chinese junior female’ tennis players

Relative age effects in Elite Chinese soccer players: Implications of the ‘one-child’ policy

The relative age effect among Chinese junior men's tennis players and its impact on sports performance

Selection-Dependent Differences in Youth Elite Basketball Players' Relative Age, Maturation-Related Characteristics, and Motor Performance

Relative age effect across the talent identification process of youth female soccer players in the United States: Influence of birth year, position, biological maturation, and skill level