Abstract:Abstract To assess the clinical value of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) combined with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) by comparing it with the MT alone. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of both observational and randomized controlled studies (RCTs) to investigate various outcomes. Our search for relevant studies was conducted between January 2011 and June 2022 in four major databases: PubMed, Embase, WOS, and Cochrane Library. We collected data on several outcomes, including functional independence (FI; defined as modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2), excellent outcomes (mRS 0–1), successful recanalization (SR), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), any intracerebral hemorrhage (aICH), and mortality at three months or discharge. The primary efficacy outcome and safety outcome were FI and sICH, respectively, whereas excellent outcomes and SR were considered secondary efficacy outcomes. Additionally, mortality and aICH were analyzed as secondary safety outcomes. We employed the Mantel–Haenszel fixed-effects model for RCTs when I 2 < 50%, otherwise the random-effects model was utilized. For observational studies and subgroup analyses, we used the random-effects model to minimize potential bias. A total of 55 eligible studies (nine RCTs and 46 observational studies) were included. For RCTs, the MT + IVT group was superior in FI (OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.11–1.46), excellent outcomes (OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.03–1.43), SR (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.05–1.45), mortality (OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.54–0.97) in crude analyses. In adjusted analyses, the MT + IVT group reduced the risk of mortality (OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.49–0.88). However, the difference in FI between the MT + IVT group and the MT alone group was not significant (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.99–1.38, Fig. 3a). For observational studies, the results of FI (OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.16–1.33), excellent outcomes (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.09–1.54), SR (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.05–1.44), mortality (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.64–0.77) in the MT + IVT group were better. Additionally, the MT + IVT group increased the risk of hemorrhagic transformation (HT) including sICH (OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.11–1.21) and aICH (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.05–1.46) in crude analyses. In adjusted analyses, significant better outcomes were seen in the MT + IVT group on FI (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.21–1.52), excellent outcomes (OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.26–1.75), and mortality (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.56–0.94). The MT + IVT therapy did improve the prognosis for AIS patients and did not increase the risk of HT compared with MT alone therapy.

Outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke and thrombocytopenia: systematic review and meta-analysis

Safety of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients with Thrombocytopenia

Abstract WP211: Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients With Mild Thrombocytopenia is Safe and Effective; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Outcomes after Thrombectomy for Minor Stroke: A Meta-Analysis

Mechanical thrombectomy combined with intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analyses

Abstract WP184: Intravenous Thrombolysis Improves Outcomes in Stroke Patients With Unsuccessful Mechanical Thrombectomy

A multicenter study of the safety and effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy for patients with acute ischemic stroke not meeting top-tier evidence criteria

Differences in outcome between left-sided and right-sided mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mechanical Thrombectomy for Mild Acute Ischemic Stroke with Large-Vessel Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke Following Cardiac Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Disability-free outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials

Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Intravenous Thrombolysis in Distal Medium Vessel Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Multinational Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study

Abstract TP192: Combined Intra-Venous and Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis versus Intra-Venous Thrombolysis Alone in Stroke Patients Undergoing Mechanical Thrombectomy for Large Vessel Occlusion: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Safety and Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Attributable to Cardiological Diseases: A Scoping Review

Reevaluating the role of heparin during mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: Increased risks without functional benefit

Abstract WP196: Blood Pressure After Endovascular Therapy: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis of Randomized Control Trials

Mechanical thrombectomy with intra-arterial alteplase provided better functional outcomes for AIS-LVO: a meta-analysis

312 Mechanical Thrombectomy With or Without Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke Due to Distal and Medium Vessel Occlusions: A Propensity Score Matching of Patients From 41 Academic Centers

Mechanical thrombectomy versus intravenous alteplase alone in acute isolated posterior cerebral artery occlusion: a systematic review

Abstract WP202: Thrombectomy versus Combined Thrombolysis and Thrombectomy for Primary Medium and Distal Intracranial Occlusions: A Propensity-Score Matched Multicenter Analysis

Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Prior Bridging Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis