Rationally seeded computational protein design of ɑ-helical barrels

Katherine I. Albanese,Rokas Petrenas,Fabio Pirro,Elise A. Naudin,Ufuk Borucu,William M. Dawson,D. Arne Scott,Graham. J. Leggett,Orion D. Weiner,Thomas A. A. Oliver,Derek N. Woolfson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-024-01642-0
IF: 14.8
2024-06-21
Nature Chemical Biology
Abstract:Computational protein design is advancing rapidly. Here we describe efficient routes starting from validated parallel and antiparallel peptide assemblies to design two families of α-helical barrel proteins with central channels that bind small molecules. Computational designs are seeded by the sequences and structures of defined de novo oligomeric barrel-forming peptides, and adjacent helices are connected by loop building. For targets with antiparallel helices, short loops are sufficient. However, targets with parallel helices require longer connectors; namely, an outer layer of helix–turn–helix–turn–helix motifs that are packed onto the barrels. Throughout these computational pipelines, residues that define open states of the barrels are maintained. This minimizes sequence sampling, accelerating the design process. For each of six targets, just two to six synthetic genes are made for expression in Escherichia coli . On average, 70% of these genes express to give soluble monomeric proteins that are fully characterized, including high-resolution structures for most targets that match the design models with high accuracy.
biochemistry & molecular biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper mainly discusses how to assemble α-helical peptides into α-helical barrel proteins through rational design and computational methods. The researchers developed a strategy to design two α-helical barrel proteins with central channels by starting with validated parallel and antiparallel peptide assemblies and connecting adjacent helices to construct loops that can bind small molecules. Short loops are sufficient for the target of antiparallel helices, while longer connectors, namely outer helix-turn-helix-turn-helix structures, are required for parallel helices, which closely pack on the barrel structure. During the design process, the researchers maintained residues defining an open state and reduced sequence sampling to accelerate the design process. They synthesized 2 to 6 synthetic genes for six targets, expressed them in Escherichia coli, and found that an average of 70% of the genes expressed as soluble monomeric proteins, with most targets obtaining high-resolution structures that matched the design models. Despite significant progress in protein design, including the application of data-driven and deep learning methods, challenges still remain, such as generating designable starting scaffolds and improving the success rate from computer design to experimental validation. The method proposed in the paper combines rational and computational design, utilizing known sequence-structure relationships as rules to guide the design and generating new protein sequences and structures rapidly and efficiently using advanced computational methods, including deep learning, particularly for barrel proteins with functional central channels. In conclusion, this paper aims to address how to effectively design novel α-helical barrel protein structures to realize their potential applications in biotechnology, medicine, and other fields, and overcome the limitations in current protein design.