Abstract:Industrial clusters are considered more resource- and greenhouse gas-efficient than stand-alone industrial plants, but clustering may also act as a barrier to radical changes required for deep greenhouse gas emission reductions. Here we explore how clustering in an energy-intensive chemical industry cluster may influence attainability of the deep emission reduction targets. Chemelot, located in the southeast of the Netherlands, was willing to collaborate and we adopt a qualitative system dynamics approach based on expert interviews and group model building sessions. We found that clustering may hinder reaching deep emission reductions by three reinforcing feedback mechanisms, or ‘traps’, related to: incremental changes; short-term focus; and companies acting alone. The system dynamics analysis also identified potential mechanisms to escape from these traps, notably: (1) increasing cluster autonomy; (2) activating public support; (3) promoting changes in the supply chain; and (4) attracting long-term investors. The findings can inform policymakers on how to steer industrial clusters towards deep emission reductions, and support industrial cluster decision-makers on both internal and external strategies. Key policy insights Industrial clustering may offer opportunities to accelerate deep greenhouse gas emission reductions, but it could also cause carbon lock-in because of increased physical and organizational interdependency, which favours incremental changes, short-term focus, and solitary actions rather than collective actions, at the cost of deep greenhouse gas emission reductions. To fully exploit the potential benefits of industrial clustering for greenhouse gas emission reductions, policies need to take into account the causal relations that operate in a self-reinforcing way to lock the cluster into high greenhouse gas emissions, and that can help escape them. A coordinating authority operating across the cluster is necessary to ensure effective collaboration within a chemical cluster so as to escape carbon lock-in. Policies addressing emissions along the full value chain (i.e. to include scope 3) might be mutually beneficial with the circularity and low-emission ambitions of the chemical industry. Industrial clustering may offer opportunities to accelerate deep greenhouse gas emission reductions, but it could also cause carbon lock-in because of increased physical and organizational interdependency, which favours incremental changes, short-term focus, and solitary actions rather than collective actions, at the cost of deep greenhouse gas emission reductions. To fully exploit the potential benefits of industrial clustering for greenhouse gas emission reductions, policies need to take into account the causal relations that operate in a self-reinforcing way to lock the cluster into high greenhouse gas emissions, and that can help escape them. A coordinating authority operating across the cluster is necessary to ensure effective collaboration within a chemical cluster so as to escape carbon lock-in. Policies addressing emissions along the full value chain (i.e. to include scope 3) might be mutually beneficial with the circularity and low-emission ambitions of the chemical industry.

Introducing Industrial Clusters in Multi-Node Energy System Modelling by the Application of the Industry–Infrastructure Quadrant

Industrial Clusters and Carbon Emission Reduction: Evidence from China

Optimizing Digital Transformation Paths for Industrial Clusters: Insights from a Simulation

Industrial clustering as a barrier and an enabler for deep emission reduction: a case study of a Dutch chemical cluster

Decarbonisation of industry and the energy system: exploring mutual impacts and investment planning

Industrial clusters as a vehicle for circular economy transition: A case study of networks in four industrial clusters in Zimbabwe

Industrial Clusters in Slovakia-Urban Development

Decarbonisation of industrial clusters: A place-based research agenda

Modeling Transformation Pathways of European Final Energy Consumption in the Transport and Buildings Sector Using Country Clustering

A Model to Analyze Industrial Clusters to Measure Land Use Efficiency in China

A new combined clustering method to Analyse the potential of district heating networks at large-scale

Identification of typical district configurations: A two-step global sensitivity analysis framework

Collaborative development model and strategies of multi-energy industry clusters: Multi-indicators analysis affecting the development of coastal energy clusters

A holarchic approach for multi-scale distributed energy system optimisation

An Optimal-Control Scheme for Coordinated Surplus-Heat Exchange in Industry Clusters

A Modelling Framework for the Conceptual Design of Low-Emission Eco-Industrial Parks in the Circular Economy: A Case for Algae-Centered Business Consortia

Modelling Deep Decarbonization of Industrial Energy Consumption under 2-Degree Target: Comparing China, India and Western Europe

Developing an Integrated Energy–Economy Model Framework for Islands

Identifying industry clusters: a critical analysis of the most commonly used methods

EnergyScope Pathway: An open-source model to optimise the energy transition pathways of a regional whole-energy system

The energy return on investment of whole energy systems: application to Belgium