Abstract:Based on patient-reported outcomes data analyzed at the provider level, there is evidence that psychotherapists can possess effectiveness strengths and weaknesses when treating patients with different presenting concerns. These within-therapist differences hold promise for personalizing care by prospectively matching patients to therapists' historical effectiveness strengths. In a double-masked randomized controlled trial (RCT; NCT02990000), such matching outperformed pragmatically determined usual case assignment—which leaves personalized, measurement-based matching to chance—in naturalistic outpatient psychotherapy (Constantino et al., JAMA Psychiatry 78:960–969, 2021). Demonstrating that personalization can be even more precise, some research has demonstrated that the strength of this positive match effect was moderated by certain patient characteristics. Notably, though, it could also be that matching is especially important for some therapists to achieve more effective outcomes. Examining this novel question, the present study drew on the Constantino et al. (JAMA Psychiatry 78:960–969, 2021) trial data to explore three therapist-level moderators of matching: (a) effectiveness "spread" (i.e., greater performance variability across patients' presenting problem domains), (b) overestimation of their measurement-based and problem-specific effectiveness, and (c) the frequency with which they use patient-reported routine outcomes monitoring in their practice. Patients were 206 adults, randomized to the match or control condition, treated by 40 therapists who were crossed over conditions. The therapist variables were assessed at the trial's baseline and patients' symptomatic/functional impairment and global distress were assessed regularly up to 16 weeks of treatment. Hierarchical linear models revealed that only therapist effectiveness spread significantly moderated the match effect for the global distress outcome; for therapists with more spread, the match effect was more pronounced, whereas the match effect was minimal for therapists with less effectiveness spread. Notably, two therapist-level covariates unexpectedly emerged as significant moderators for the symptomatic/functional impairment outcome; for clinicians who consistently treated patients with higher versus lower average severity levels and who relatedly treated a higher proportion of patients with primary presenting problems of substance misuse or violence, the beneficial match effect was even stronger. Thus, measurement-based matching may be especially potent for therapists with more variable effectiveness across problem domains, and who consistently treat patients with more severe presenting concerns or with particular primary problems, which provides further precision in conceptualizing personalized care.

Therapist responsiveness in psychotherapy: Introduction to the special issue

How to become a responsive therapist: A study of experiences of developing therapists

Effects of therapist response modes in brief psychotherapy.

Understanding non-response in psychotherapy: A meta-synthesis

Therapeutic relationship elements and therapy session outcomes: Protocol for a longitudinal study of the patient's perspective

Responding to Key Process Markers as a Focus of Psychotherapy Training and Practice

What makes psychotherapy sessions productive? a new approach to bridging the gap between process research and practice

Lessons from ten years of psychotherapy process research

Discovering Optimal Responsiveness within the Salience of Emergent Process

Exploring the outcomes of psychotherapy sessions: how do therapists' responsiveness and emotional responses to patients with personality disorders affect the depth of elaboration?

Therapists' responsiveness in the process of ruptures and resolution: Are patients and therapists on the same page?

This is not just a commentary on evidence-based group therapy research: It is important to the future of psychotherapy practice.

Relationships and responsiveness in the psychological treatment of trauma: The tragedy of the APA Clinical Practice Guideline.

Therapist-Level Moderators of Patient-Therapist Match Effectiveness in Community Psychotherapy

“Research doesn’t fit in a 50-minute hour”: The phenomenology of therapists’ involvement in research at a university counseling center

Clinical and Research Perspectives on the Therapeutic Conversation: The Case of MS. M.

An Introduction to Change in Psychotherapy: Moderators, Course of Change, and Change Mechanisms

Self-organization in psychotherapy: testing the synergetic model of change processes

Training students to become responsive therapists: implications from a sequential mixed-methods study on situations that therapists find challenging

Rethinking treatment failures. Research on a group of Italian psychotherapists

What research for what training in psychotherapy? Some methodological issues and a proposal