Direct Ink Writing for Electrochemical Device Fabrication: A Review of 3D-Printed Electrodes and Ink Rheology

Nickolas D. Polychronopoulos,Angeliki Brouzgou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14020110

IF: 3.9

2024-01-30

Catalysts

Abstract:Three-dimensional printed electrodes seem to overcome many structural and operational limitations compared to ones fabricated with conventional methods. Compared to other 3D printing techniques, direct ink writing (DIW), as a sub-category of extrusion-based 3D printing techniques, allows for easier fabrication, the utilization of various materials, and high flexibility in electrode architectures with low costs. Despite the conveniences in fabrication procedures that are facilitated by DIW, what qualifies an ink as 3D printable has become challenging to discern. Probing rheological ink properties such as viscoelastic moduli and yield stress appears to be a promising approach to determine 3D printability. Yet, issues arise regarding standardization protocols. It is essential for the ink filament to be extruded easily and continuously to maintain dimensional accuracy, even after post-processing methods related to electrode fabrication. Additives frequently present in the inks need to be removed, and this procedure affects the electrical and electrochemical properties of the 3D-printed electrodes. In this context, the aim of the current review was to analyze various energy devices, highlighting the type of inks synthesized and their measured rheological properties. This review fills a gap in the existing literature. Thus, according to the inks that have been formulated, we identified two categories of DIW electrode architectures that have been manufactured: supported and free-standing architectures.

chemistry, physical

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to solve the problems of electrode structure and performance in electrochemical devices, especially to fabricate 3D - printed electrodes through the Direct Ink Writing (DIW) technology. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following aspects:

1. **Overcoming the limitations of traditional manufacturing methods**: Compared with traditional manufacturing methods, 3D - printed electrodes have many advantages in structure and operation. As a subclass of extrusion - based 3D printing technology, DIW can fabricate electrodes more easily, use a variety of materials, and has high flexibility in electrode architecture while being cost - effective.

2. **Determining the printability of 3D - printing inks**: Although the DIW technology simplifies the manufacturing process, it is becoming more and more challenging to determine whether an ink is suitable for 3D printing. The research points out that probing the rheological properties of sample inks, such as viscoelastic modulus and yield stress, is a promising method to judge their 3D - printing ability. However, the problem of standardized protocols still exists.

3. **Analyzing 3D - printed electrodes in different energy devices**: The paper also analyzes 3D - printed electrodes used in various energy devices, with an emphasis on the types of synthesized inks and their measured rheological properties. This fills a gap in the existing literature. According to the formulated inks, the paper identifies two types of DIW electrode architectures: supported and free - standing.

In conclusion, the main purpose of this review paper is to analyze and summarize the latest progress of 3D - printed electrodes, especially the research on DIW technology and related ink rheological properties, in order to promote the performance improvement and commercialization process of electrochemical devices.