Mach number analysis of hydrogen flow in labyrinth passage under high pressure gradient
Fu-qiang Chen,Zhe Jiang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.10.149
IF: 7.2
2023-10-29
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Abstract:This work delves into a novel concept that harnesses the potential of labyrinth passages for hydrogen decompression, offering the advantage of dispersing the mainstream into multiple channels, thereby reducing hydrogen mass and energy. Compared to traditional hydrogen decompression devices, this approach demonstrates adaptability to high pressure gradients and boasts a simple structure. For the industry, the perennial challenge has been controlling energy loss and enhancing aerodynamic performance during hydrogen decompression. Hence, our primary focus lies in addressing the key challenges related to labyrinth passages in this field. Within this study, a detailed design of the labyrinth passage is proposed, and the correlation between Mach number and energy loss is studied. Additionally, an in-depth study is conducted on the effects of throttling parameters on Mach number in the labyrinth passage, aiming to achieve an optimized design. The results reveal a linear correlation between Mach number and energy loss. Furthermore, the research highlights that different throttling parameters have distinct impacts on energy loss. By utilizing the maximum average Mach number ( Ma ̅max ) as a metric to evaluate different designs, we have determined the range ( Ŕ ) of factor values for series number ( n i / n 0 ), widths ( w i / w 0 ), expansion coefficients ( r i / r 0 ), interstage heights ( h i / h 0 ) and depths ( d i / d 0 ) to be 0.687, 0.482, 0.228, 0.075, and 0.036, respectively. The range ( Ŕ ) directly signifies the influence that each factor has on the Mach number. As a result, it has been deduced that the parameter effects on controlling energy loss follow a descending order: series number ( n i / n 0 ), widths ( w i / w 0 ), expansion coefficients ( r i / r 0 ), interstage heights ( h i / h 0 ) and depths ( d i / d 0 ). Moreover, for each factor, the preferred level ranking consistently remains as IV, III, II, and I. Therefore, considering the need to control manufacturing costs, it is recommended to opt for a larger series number, expansion coefficient and a smaller width and interstage height.
energy & fuels,electrochemistry,chemistry, physical