The role of vision in sensory integration models for predicting motion perception and sickness

Varun Kotian,Tugrul Irmak,Daan Pool,Riender Happee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-023-06747-x

2024-01-24

Experimental Brain Research

Abstract:Users of automated vehicles will engage in other activities and take their eyes off the road, making them prone to motion sickness. To resolve this, the current paper validates models predicting sickness in response to motion and visual conditions. We validate published models of vestibular and visual sensory integration that have been used for predicting motion sickness through sensory conflict. We use naturalistic driving data and laboratory motion (and vection) paradigms, such as sinusoidal translation and rotation at different frequencies, Earth-Vertical Axis Rotation, Off-Vertical Axis Rotation, Centrifugation, Somatogravic Illusion, and Pseudo-Coriolis, to evaluate different models for both motion perception and motion sickness. We investigate the effects of visual motion perception in terms of rotational velocity (visual flow) and verticality. According to our findings, the SVC I model, a 6DOF model based on the Subjective Vertical Conflict (SVC) theory, with visual rotational velocity input is effective at estimating motion sickness. However, it does not correctly replicate motion perception in paradigms such as roll-tilt perception during centrifuge, pitch perception during somatogravic illusion, and pitch perception during pseudo-Coriolis motions. On the other hand, the Multi-Sensory Observer Model (MSOM) accurately models motion perception in all considered paradigms, but does not effectively capture the frequency sensitivity of motion sickness, and the effects of vision on sickness. For both models (SVC I and MSOM), the visual perception of rotational velocity strongly affects sickness and perception. Visual verticality perception does not (yet) contribute to sickness prediction, and contributes to perception prediction only for the somatogravic illusion. In conclusion, the SVC I model with visual rotation velocity feedback is the current preferred option to design vehicle control algorithms for motion sickness reduction, while the MSOM best predicts perception. A unified model that jointly captures perception and motion sickness remains to be developed.

neurosciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address the issue of motion sickness in automated vehicles when occupants engage in other activities due to being detached from the driving task. To tackle this problem, the paper validates several models for predicting motion sickness, which are based on the sensory integration of the vestibular and visual systems to predict motion perception and motion sickness. Specifically, the paper evaluates the predictive performance of different models for motion perception and motion sickness under various visual conditions, such as natural driving data and laboratory motion experiments (e.g., sinusoidal translation, rotation, etc.).

The main findings are as follows:
- **SVCI Model**: Based on the Subjective Vertical Conflict (SVC) theory, the model incorporates visual rotational velocity input and can estimate motion sickness well, but performs poorly in some motion perception tests (e.g., roll perception in a centrifuge).
- **Multisensory Observer Model (MSOM)**: Accurately predicts motion perception in various conditions but is not precise enough in capturing the frequency sensitivity of motion sickness and the impact of visual influences.

The conclusions indicate that the SVCI model, combined with visual rotational velocity feedback, is currently the preferred choice for designing vehicle control algorithms aimed at reducing motion sickness, while the MSOM performs best in predicting motion perception. However, there is currently no unified model that can accurately predict both motion perception and motion sickness simultaneously.