Comparison of clinical outcomes between cystotome-assisted prechop phacoemulsification surgery and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery for hard nucleus cataracts
Ye He,Chao Wang,Xuezhi Zhou,Jingjie Peng,Xuan Zhang,Yujue Wang,Yuhua Rui,Cheng Zhang,Wulong Zhang,Lemeng Feng,Shirui Dai,Xiaobo Xia,Weitao Song
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01900-8
IF: 4.4563
2022-01-29
Eye
Abstract:Background/ObjectivesTo compare the safety and efficacy of cystotome-assisted prechop phacoemulsification surgery (CAPPS) and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) in patients with hard nucleus cataract.Subjects/MethodsNinety-six eyes of 64 patients with grade IV hard nucleus cataract were assigned to 1 of the 2 groups (49 CAPPS and 47 FLACS). Follow-up visits were performed at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year, and the outcome measures comprised ultrasound power, effective phacoemulsification time (EPT), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), endothelial cell density (ECD), corneal endothelium cell loss rate (ECL), central corneal thickness (CCT), and intraoperative and postoperative complications.ResultsThe ultrasound power and EPT were lower in the CAPPS group (p = 0.03 and <0.0001, respectively). Patients in both groups gained better CDVA postoperatively. The ECD value decreased at each follow-up visit and did not return to the preoperative level; FLACS resulted in greater endothelial cell loss compared to CAPPS. CCT increased immediately after the surgery and decreased thereafter. The mean CCT value returned to the preoperative level 3 months postoperatively in the CAPPS group, while in the FLACS group, CCT value took 6 months to return to the preoperative level. Miosis was more likely to occur in the FLACS group.ConclusionsDue to its efficacy and cost-effectiveness, CAPPS is worth promoting and applying to clinical work in the future.
ophthalmology