High circulating dipeptidyl peptidase 3 predicts mortality and need for organ support in cardiogenic shock: An ancillary analysis of the ACCOST-HH trial

Adrien Picod,Hugo Nordin,Dominik Jarczak,Tanja Zeller,Claire Oddos,Karine Santos,Oliver Hartmann,Antoine Herpain,Alexandre Mebazaa,Stefan Kluge,Feriel Azibani,Mahir Karakas
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.03.014
IF: 6.592
2024-05-01
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Abstract:Background Cardiogenic shock is burdened with high mortality. Efforts to improve outcome are hampered by the difficulty of individual risk stratification and the lack of targetable pathways. Previous studies demonstrated that elevated circulating dipeptidyl peptidase 3 (cDPP3) is an early predictor of short-term outcome in cardiogenic shock, mostly of ischemic origin. Our objective was to investigate the association between cDPP3 and short-terms outcomes in a diverse population of cardiogenic shock. Methods cDPP3 was measured at baseline and after 72 hours in the ACCOST-HH trial. The association of cDPP3 with 30-day mortality and need for organ support was assessed. Results Median cDPP3 concentration at baseline was 43.2 ng/mL [21.2-74] and 77 out of the 150 patients (52%) had high cDPP3 over the pre-defined cutoff of 40 ng/mL. Elevated cDPP3 was associated with higher 30-day mortality (adjusted (a) HR=1.7 [1.0-2.9]), fewer days alive without cardiovascular support (3 [0–24] vs 21 days [5–26], p<0.0001), a higher need for renal replacement therapy (56 vs 22%, p<0.0001) and mechanical ventilation (90 vs 74%, p=0.04). Patients with sustained high cDPP3 had poor prognosis (reference group). In contrast, patients with initially high but decreasing cDPP3 at 72 hours had markedly reduced 30-day mortality (aHR=0.17 [0.084–0.34]), comparable to patients with sustained low cDPP3 (aHR=0.23 [0.12–0.41]). Need for organ support was markedly reduced in subpopulations with sustained low or decreasing cDPP3. Conclusion The present study confirms the prognostic value of cDPP3 in a contemporary population of cardiogenic shock.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?