Abstract:Background: The purpose of this study was to assess outcomes after spinal anesthesia (SA) versus general anesthesia (GA) in patients undergoing thoracic endograft placement and to evaluate the adjunctive use of cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) placement. Methods: A single-center retrospective review of patients that underwent thoracic endograft placement from 2001 to 2019 was performed. Patients were stratified based on the type of anesthesia they received: GA, SA or epidural, GA with CSFD, and SA with CSFD. Primary outcomes included 30-day mortality and length of stay (LOS). Baseline characteristics were analyzed with Student's t-test and Pearson's chi-squared test. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for 30-day mortality and longer LOS. Results: A total of 333 patients underwent thoracic endograft placement; 104 patients received SA, 180 patients received GA, 30 patients received GA and CSFD, and 19 patients received SA and CSFD. Of the total patients, 16.2% underwent thoracic endograft placement for type B aortic dissection, 3.3% for type A aortic dissection, and 12.3% for penetrating ulcer. The mean age of the study population was 68.7 years old. Patients undergoing SA were older with a mean age of 73.4 years versus 64.7 years for patients undergoing GA (P < 0.001). Spinal anesthesia (SA) was preferred in patients at high risk for GA (>75 years old: 52.9% vs. 33.3%, P < 0.001; renal comorbidities: 20.6% vs. 10.6%, P = 0.03, and current smokers: 26.7% vs. 9.6%, P < 0.001). Length of stay (LOS) was decreased in the SA group (4.29 days vs. 9.70 days, P < 0.001). There was a lower incidence of spinal cord ischemia in the SA group (1.0% vs. 2.2%, P = 0.44), as well as significantly decreased 30-day mortality (0% vs. 5.6%, P = 0.01), reintervention (19.2% vs. 26.8%, P = 0.02), and return to the operating room (6.8% vs. 12.7%, P = 0.02). Of the 19 patients that had SA + CSFD, there were no signs and symptoms of spinal cord ischemia and decreased incidence of perioperative complications (0% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.01). There was no difference in the risk for intraoperative complications, neurologic complications, or 30-day mortality between GA + CSFD patients versus SA + CSFD patients. Age >75 (P = 0.002), intraoperative complications (P < 0.001), and perioperative complications (P = 0.02) were associated with increased mortality after thoracic endograft placement per multivariate logistic regression analysis. Conclusions: Spinal anesthesia (SA) in select high-risk patients was associated with reduced 30-day mortality, neurologic complications, and LOS compared to GA. The concurrent use of spinal drainage and SA had satisfactory results compared to spinal drainage and GA.

Abdominal aortic calcification is an independent predictor of perioperative blood loss in posterior spinal fusion surgery

Association Between Plasma Lipoprotein Levels and Aortic Valve Calcification among Patients with Aortic Valve Replacement Surgery: A Retrospective Study

Abdominal Aortic Calcification is Not Superior over Other Vascular Calcification in Predicting Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients: a Retrospective Observational Study

Prognostic Value of Abdominal Aortic Calcification: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Abdominal aortic calcification among gastroenterological and transplant surgery

Does aortic calcification really affect anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery?

Impact of Abdominal Aortic Calcification After Major Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Evaluation of abdominal aortic calcification by plain CT predicts anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer

Use of Spinal Anesthesia during Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

Abdominal Aortic Calcification is Superior to Other Arteries Calcification in Predicting the Mortality in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients – a 8 Years Cohort Study

Correlation Between Calcium Scoring and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Endovascular Repair Outcomes

Association of abdominal aortic calcification estimated by plain radiography with outcomes in haemodialysis patients: A 6-year follow-up study

Abdominal Aortic Calcification Score Can Predict All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients.

Systematic evaluation of abdominal aortic calcification in patients with a recent clinical fracture visiting the Fracture Liaison Service

Abdominal aortic calcification as prognostic marker in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

Abdominal Aortic Calcification Score As a Predictor of Clinical Outcome in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: a Prospective Cohort Study

Abdominal Aortic Calcification Can Predict All-Cause Mortality And Cv Events In Dialysis Patients: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis

Abdominal aortic calcification detected by lateral lumbar X-ray in maintenance hemodialysis patients

Calcification of surgical aortic bioprostheses and its impact on clinical outcome

Descending aortic calcification increases renal dysfunction and in-hospital mortality in cardiac surgery patients with intraaortic balloon pump counterpulsation placed perioperatively: a case control study

The Aortic Calcification Index is a Risk Factor Associated with Anastomotic Leakage after Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer.