Impact of Karnofsky performance status on outcomes of patients with severe alcohol‐associated hepatitis: a propensity‐matched analysis

Anand V. Kulkarni,Shantan Venishetty,Karan Kumar,Nitish Gurav,Somaya Albhaisi,Prateek Chhabbra,Sameer Shaik,Manasa Alla,Sowmya Iyengar,Mithun Sharma,Padaki N. Rao,Juan P. Arab,Duvvur N. Reddy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.16562
2024-10-28
Internal Medicine Journal
Abstract:Background and Aims Severity scores, including the model for end‐stage liver disease (MELD) and discriminant function score, guide the treatment of patients with severe alcohol‐associated hepatitis (AH). We aimed to investigate the impact of functional status on outcomes of patients with AH. Methods Medically managed patients (n = 133) with AH from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2022 were included in this prospective study. The objectives were to compare the long‐term survival, recompensation rates, corticosteroid response, incidence of infections, hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and acute kidney injury (AKI) among propensity score‐matched patients with good Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (score ≥50) and poor KPS (score <50) using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Results Twenty‐five patients with good KPS were matched with 25 patients with poor KPS and followed up for a median duration of 10 (0.5–33) months. Survival was 76% (19/25; 95% confidence interval (CI), 54.9–90.6) in patients with good KPS compared to 42.3% (11/25; 95% CI, 23.4–63.1) patients with poor KPS (P = 0.001) at 10 months. The recompensation rate was higher in the good KPS group than in the poor KPS group (68% vs 44%; P = 0.04). A higher proportion of patients in the good KPS group (78.9%) than in the poor KPS group (42.8%; P = 0.03) responded to corticosteroids. Survival was lower among non‐responders in the poor KPS group (0% vs 75%; P = 0.01). The proportion of patients who developed infection (36% vs 28%; P = 0.051), HE (36% vs 12%; P = 0.01) and AKI (60% vs 16%; P
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?