A matching-adjusted indirect comparison of the efficacy of elranatamab versus teclistamab in patients with triple-class exposed/refractory multiple myeloma

Isha MolYannan HuThomas W. LeBlancJoseph C. CappelleriHaitao ChuGuido NadorDidem AydinAlex SchepartPatrick Hlavaceka Cytel,Inc.,Rotterdam,The Netherlandsb Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy,Duke University School of Medicine,Durham,NC,USAc Pfizer Inc.,Groton,CT,USAd Pfizer Inc.,New York,NY,USAe Pfizer Inc.,Tadworth,UKf Pfizer Inc.,Istanbul,Turkey
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2024.2313628
2024-02-14
Leukemia & Lymphoma
Abstract:For patients with triple-class exposed/refractory multiple myeloma (TCE/RMM), where effective treatments options are limited, B-cell maturation antigen and CD3-directed bispecific antibodies offer a promising new approach. Teclistamab gained conditional approval in Europe and accelerated Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval based on the MajesTEC-1 trial (NCT03145181). Elranatamab, approved by the FDA demonstrated its safety and efficacy in the MagnetisMM-3 trial (NCT04649359). Given the absence of head-to-head trials, an unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was conducted to assess their relative efficacy. Key baseline characteristics were adjusted to be comparable between the two trials. In the MAIC, elranatamab demonstrated significantly better objective response rate and progression-free survival (PFS) than teclistamab, and numerically better complete response, duration of response, and overall survival (OS). These results suggest that elranatamab is an efficacious option for treating patients with TCE/R MM.
oncology,hematology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?