A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Jiwon Lee,Dong Woo Han,Young Song,Jongyun Lee,Soyoung Jeon,Myoung Hwa Kim
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14040382
IF: 3.5083
2024-04-03
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Abstract:This study compared the overall postoperative recovery of patients who underwent total intravenous anesthesia with remimazolam or propofol, using the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire (QoR-15). Seventy-two patients who underwent spine surgery with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) were randomly categorized into the remimazolam group (group R) or propofol group (group P). On the first postoperative day, the QoR-15 scores for groups P and R were 114 and 112, respectively, indicating no significant difference (p = 0.691). Similarly, group–time interaction effects on QoR-15 scores were not significantly different. In the post-anesthesia care unit, the pain intensity at rest was notably higher in group P than in group R (3.0 [0.0] vs. 2.8 [0.5], respectively, p = 0.009). Although the intraoperative consumption of remifentanil was higher in group R (1452.4 μg vs. 2066.8 μg, respectively, p < 0.001), the intraoperative use of vasopressors was lower in group R (1705.6 μg vs. 286.1 μg, respectively, p < 0.001) compared to group P. Group R exhibited significantly lower variability in mean blood pressure over time compared to group P. Remimazolam was viewed as a promising intravenous agent for general anesthesia, showing potential to replace propofol in spine surgery with IONM, considering both recovery quality and intraoperative hemodynamic stability.
medicine, general & internal,health care sciences & services
What problem does this paper attempt to address?