Safety and efficacy of first-line dacomitinib in Asian patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer: Results from a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial (ARCHER 1050)

Ying Cheng,Tony S Mok,Xiangdong Zhou,Shun Lu,Qing Zhou,Jianying Zhou,Yingying Du,Ping Yu,Xiaoqing Liu,Chengping Hu,You Lu,Yiping Zhang,Ki Hyeong Lee,Kazuhiko Nakagawa,Rolf Linke,Chew Hooi Wong,Yiyun Tang,Fanfan Zhu,Keith D Wilner,Yi-Long Wu,Tony S. Mok,Keith D. Wilner
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.02.025
IF: 6.081
2021-04-01
Lung Cancer
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Objectives</h3><p>To compare efficacy and safety of dacomitinib versus gefitinib as first-line therapy for <em>EGFR</em> mutation-positive advanced NSCLC in Asian patients enrolled in the ongoing ARCHER 1050 trial.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Materials and methods</h3><p>In this ongoing, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial (NCT01774721), eligible patients with newly diagnosed advanced <em>EGFR</em> mutation-positive NSCLC, were randomized (1:1) to receive oral dacomitinib 45 mg/day or oral gefitinib 250 mg/day. Randomization, by a central computer system, was stratified by race and <em>EGFR</em> mutation type (exon 19 deletion mutation/exon 21 L858R substitution mutation). The primary endpoint was PFS by blinded independent review.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>Of 346 Asian patients, 170 were randomized to dacomitinib and 176 to gefitinib. The hazard ratio (HR) for PFS with dacomitinib versus gefitinib was 0.509 (95% confidence interval [CI]; 95% CI: 0.391–0.662; 1-sided p &lt; 0.0001; median 16.5 months [95% CI: 12.9–18.4] vs. 9.3 months [95% CI: 9.2–11.0]). HR for OS with dacomitinib versus gefitinib was 0.759; 95% CI: 0.578–0.996; median 37.7 months [95% CI: 30.2–44.7] vs. 29.1 months [95% CI: 25.6–36.0]). The OS benefit was still maintained in those patients who had a stepwise dose reduction of dacomitinib (to 30 and 15 mg/day). The most common adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea (154 [90.6%] patients), paronychia (110 [64.7%]), dermatitis acneiform (96 [56.5%]), and stomatitis (87 [51.2%]) with dacomitinib, and diarrhea (100 [56.8%]), alanine aminotransferase increased (81 [46.0%]), and aspartate aminotransferase increased (75 [42.6%]) with gefitinib. Treatment-related serious AEs were reported in 16 (9.4%) and 8 (4.5%) patients treated with dacomitinib and gefitinib, respectively.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3><p>First-line dacomitinib was associated with significant prolongation of PFS and improved OS compared with gefitinib in Asian patients with <em>EGFR</em> mutation-positive advanced NSCLC. The AE profiles of dacomitinib and gefitinib in Asian patients were consistent with the overall ARCHER 1050 population.</p>
oncology,respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?