Quantifying dysmorphologies of the neurocranium using artificial neural networks

Tareq Abdel‐Alim,Franz Tapia Chaca,Irene M. J. Mathijssen,Clemens M. F. Dirven,Wiro J. Niessen,Eppo B. Wolvius,Marie‐Lise C. van Veelen,Gennady V. Roshchupkin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.14061
2024-05-19
Journal of Anatomy
Abstract:This study introduces a novel explainable AI approach for the objective quantification of craniosynostosis severity, based on a reduced shape representation. This ensures complete patient anonymity and invariance to geometric size and orientation. The proposed severity metric, the "Feature Prominence Score," captures distinct shape characteristics associated with specific classes and strongly correlates with clinical severity scores, providing a metric for objective treatment evaluation. Background Craniosynostosis, a congenital condition characterized by the premature fusion of cranial sutures, necessitates objective methods for evaluating cranial morphology to enhance patient treatment. Current subjective assessments often lead to inconsistent outcomes. This study introduces a novel, quantitative approach to classify craniosynostosis and measure its severity. Methods An artificial neural network was trained to classify normocephalic, trigonocephalic, and scaphocephalic head shapes based on a publicly available dataset of synthetic 3D head models. Each 3D model was converted into a low‐dimensional shape representation based on the distribution of normal vectors, which served as the input for the neural network, ensuring complete patient anonymity and invariance to geometric size and orientation. Explainable AI methods were utilized to highlight significant features when making predictions. Additionally, the Feature Prominence (FP) score was introduced, a novel metric that captures the prominence of distinct shape characteristics associated with a given class. Its relationship with clinical severity scores was examined using the Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient. Results The final model achieved excellent test accuracy in classifying the different cranial shapes from their low‐dimensional representation. Attention maps indicated that the network's attention was predominantly directed toward the parietal and temporal regions, as well as toward the region signifying vertex depression in scaphocephaly. In trigonocephaly, features around the temples were most pronounced. The FP score showed a strong positive monotonic relationship with clinical severity scores in both scaphocephalic (ρ = 0.83, p
anatomy & morphology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?