Attenuation Coefficient Estimation for PET/MRI With Bayesian Deep Learning pseudo-CT and Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Activity and Attenuation

Andrew P. Leynes,Sangtae Ahn,Kristen A. Wangerin,Sandeep S. Kaushik,Florian Wiesinger,Thomas A. Hope,Peder E. Z. Larson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/trpms.2021.3118325
2021-01-01
IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences
Abstract:A major remaining challenge for magnetic resonance-based attenuation correction methods (MRAC) is their susceptibility to sources of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artifacts (e.g., implants and motion) and uncertainties due to the limitations of MRI contrast (e.g., accurate bone delineation and density, and separation of air/bone). We propose using a Bayesian deep convolutional neural network that in addition to generating an initial pseudo-CT from MR data, it also produces uncertainty estimates of the pseudo-CT to quantify the limitations of the MR data. These outputs are combined with the maximum-likelihood estimation of activity and attenuation (MLAA) reconstruction that uses the PET emission data to improve the attenuation maps. With the proposed approach uncertainty estimation and pseudo-CT prior for robust MLAA (UpCT-MLAA), we demonstrate accurate estimation of PET uptake in pelvic lesions and show recovery of metal implants. In patients without implants, UpCT-MLAA had acceptable but slightly higher root-mean-squared-error (RMSE) than Zero-echo-time and Dixon Deep pseudo-CT when compared to CTAC. In patients with metal implants, MLAA recovered the metal implant; however, anatomy outside the implant region was obscured by noise and crosstalk artifacts. Attenuation coefficients from the pseudo-CT from Dixon MRI were accurate in normal anatomy; however, the metal implant region was estimated to have attenuation coefficients of air. UpCT-MLAA estimated attenuation coefficients of metal implants alongside accurate anatomic depiction outside of implant regions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?