Assessing the sustainability of modified biosand filters using life cycle assessment, cost and performance factors

Jamiu O. Eniola,Banu Sizirici
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05297-8
IF: 4.08
2024-08-18
Environment Development and Sustainability
Abstract:Biosand filter is being used as a low-cost, point-of-use, drinking water treatment technique globally. However, due to the limitations of biosand filter in achieving complete decontamination of drinking water, modification of the biosand filters were proposed which have increased the environmental burden of filter production. This study aims to compare the environmental impact, cost, and performance of the biosand filter (BSF), the physically modified biosand filter with biochar addition (MBSF biochar), and the chemically modified biosand filter (MBSF) by coating the gravel with iron oxide (MBSF IOCG). Life cycle assessment was modeled using the SimaPro version 9.1.17. It was found that natural aggregate extraction has the most impact on BSF and MBSFs fabrication. The total environmental impact of filters were; MBSF IOCG (675.8898 pt), > MBSF biochar (674.9818 pt), > BSF (672.5751 pt). Modification of the BSFs increased the cost and environmental burden of MBSF production. When the modification process in the MBSFs was compared, it was found that the production of biochar was less environmentally friendly (3.34 pt) than the Iron oxide coating of Gravel (IOCG) (3.14 pt). The estimated cost of constructing the filters was; MBSF (IOCG) ( 20.99) > BSF ($ 18.49). Although modifications increased the cost and environmental impact of filters, the performance of filters slightly increased for the removal of the tested pollutants. For instance, MBSF (IOCG) showed a removal percentage of 99.27% for Cu, 99.1% for Zn, 95.28% for Fe, 98.6% for Ni, and 95.33% for total coliform. On the other hand, MBSF (biochar) showed 99.2% for Cu, 99% for Zn, 78% for Fe, 75.4% for Ni, and 92.8% for Total coliform removals while the BSF gave a removal percentage of 99% for Cu, 90% for Zn, 60.1% for Fe, 73% for Ni and 93.89% for Total coliform. Accordingly, recommendations were proposed for a more sustainable BSF and its modification to achieve a high treatment efficiency of drinking water.
environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?