The clinical effect of computerized cognitive remediation therapy in schizophrenic patients with different levels of cognitive impairment
张洁,范宏振,朱小林,王云辉,谭云龙,杨甫德,王志仁,赵艳丽,范丰梅,郭俊花,李占江,权文香,王向群,周东丰,邹义壮,谭淑平
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn113661-20191010-00354-1
2020-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To explore the improvement rate of the cognitive function of computerized cognitive remediation therapy (CCRT) on patients with schizophrenia and the clinical effect of CCRT in patients with different levels of cognitive impairment.Methods:A random number table was used to divide 311 patients with schizophrenia into CCRT group (
n=196) and work and amusement therapy (WAT) group (
n=115). The independently developed CCRT and operational music and dance therapy were given for 12 weeks to two treatment groups respectively. All patients were assessed using the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) before and after treatment. According to the total score of MCCB at baseline, the patient′s cognition function was divided into 4 levels: severe cognitive impairment, moderate cognitive impairment, mild cognitive impairment and normal cognitive function. According to the change of MCCB total score, the efficacy of the treatment was divided into 3 levels: no improvement (≤0 points), improvement (0-9.57 points), superior improvement (>9.57 points). The improvement rate of cognitive function between two treatment groups was compared.
Results:In the CCRT group, there were 19 cases with superior improvement, 105 cases with improvement, and 46 cases with no improvement. In the WAT group, there were 7 cases with superior improvement, 39 cases with improvement, and 41 cases with no improvement. The improvement of cognitive function of CCRT group was better than that of WAT group, and the difference was statistically significant (
Z=2.978,
P=0.003). The patients with serious cognitive impairment in the CCRT group had a higher improvement rate than those in the WAT group (
Z=1.860,
P=0.032). The patients with moderate cognitive impairment in the CCRT group had a lower no improvement rate than those in the WAT (
Z=-1.817,
P=0.035).The patients with mild cognitive impairment in the CCRT group had a lower no improvement rate (
Z=-3.294,
P=0.001) and higher improvement rate and superior improvement rate (
Z=2.084,
P=0.019;
Z=1.969,
P=0.025) than those in the WAT group. There was no statistically significant difference in improvement rate between patients with normal cognitive function in the CCRT group and in the WAT group (
P>0.05).The patients with improvement and superior improvement of cognition were combined as responder, and the two treatment groups were compared. The patients with mild cognitive impairment in the CCRT group had a higher improvement rate than those in the WAT group (77.2%（44/57）
vs. 41.4%（12/29），χ2=10.853，
P=0.001). However, for patients with serious and moderate cognitive impairment or with normal cognitive function at baseline, rates of improvement after treatment did not differ significantly between CCRT group and WAT group. According to
Cohen′s d, the level of effect size in cognition improvement after CCRT treatment in patients with different cognitive dysfunction level was: mild cognitive impairment (0.59)>moderate cognitive impairment (0.48)>normal cognitive function (-0.12)>serious cognitive impairment (-0.24).
Conclusions:Schizophrenic patients treated with CCRT had a higher improvement rate of cognitive function than those with WAT, and the improvement rate of cognitive function is higher in patients with mild cognitive impairment after CCRT treatment.