Abstract:Risk prediction models fitted using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) are often overfitted resulting in predictions that are too extreme and a calibration slope (CS) less than 1. Penalized methods, such as Ridge and Lasso, have been suggested as a solution to this problem as they tend to shrink regression coefficients toward zero, resulting in predictions closer to the average. The amount of shrinkage is regulated by a tuning parameter, λ, commonly selected via cross‐validation ("standard tuning"). Though penalized methods have been found to improve calibration on average, they often over‐shrink and exhibit large variability in the selected λ and hence the CS. This is a problem, particularly for small sample sizes, but also when using sample sizes recommended to control overfitting. We consider whether these problems are partly due to selecting λ using cross‐validation with "training" datasets of reduced size compared to the original development sample, resulting in an over‐estimation of λ and, hence, excessive shrinkage. We propose a modified cross‐validation tuning method ("modified tuning"), which estimates λ from a pseudo‐development dataset obtained via bootstrapping from the original dataset, albeit of larger size, such that the resulting cross‐validation training datasets are of the same size as the original dataset. Modified tuning can be easily implemented in standard software and is closely related to bootstrap selection of the tuning parameter ("bootstrap tuning"). We evaluated modified and bootstrap tuning for Ridge and Lasso in simulated and real data using recommended sample sizes, and sizes slightly lower and higher. They substantially improved the selection of λ , resulting in improved CS compared to the standard tuning method. They also improved predictions compared to MLE.

Generalized Cross-Validation as a Method for Choosing a Good Ridge Parameter

Fast cross-validation for multi-penalty ridge regression

Subsample Ridge Ensembles: Equivalences and Generalized Cross-Validation

Optimizing for Generalization in Machine Learning with Cross-Validation Gradients

Risk and cross validation in ridge regression with correlated samples

Bayes beats Cross Validation: Efficient and Accurate Ridge Regression via Expectation Maximization

A generalized approximate cross validation for smoothing splines with non-Gaussian data

Stability-Adjusted Cross-Validation for Sparse Linear Regression

Penalized Regression Methods With Modified Cross‐Validation and Bootstrap Tuning Produce Better Prediction Models

ROTI-GCV: Generalized Cross-Validation for right-ROTationally Invariant Data

Generalized Cross-Validation as a Method of Hyperparameter Search for MTGV Regularization

A New Formula for Faster Computation of the K-Fold Cross-Validation and Good Regularisation Parameter Values in Ridge Regression

Corrected generalized cross-validation for finite ensembles of penalized estimators

Gradient-based bilevel optimization for multi-penalty Ridge regression through matrix differential calculus

A semi-automatic method to guide the choice of ridge parameter in ridge regression

Is Cross-Validation the Gold Standard to Evaluate Model Performance?

Cross-validation: what does it estimate and how well does it do it?

Cross-validation in nonparametric regression with outliers

Failures and Successes of Cross-Validation for Early-Stopped Gradient Descent

On the Asymptotic Optimality of Cross-Validation based Hyper-parameter Estimators for Regularized Least Squares Regression Problems