European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging survey on cardiovascular multimodality imaging in acute myocarditis

Yohann Bohbot,Théo Pezel,Ahmet Demirkıran,Emmanuel Androulakis,Golnaz Houshmand,Liliana Szabo,Robert Manka,Simona B Botezatu,José F Rodríguez-Palomares,Tor Biering-Sørensen,Tomaz Podlesnikar,Marc R Dweck
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeae092
2024-04-03
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
Abstract:Abstract Aims To assess the current role of cardiac imaging in the diagnosis, management, and follow-up of patients with acute myocarditis (AM) through a European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging survey. Methods and results A total of 412 volunteers from 74 countries responded to the survey. Most participants worked in tertiary centres (56%). All participants had access to echocardiography, while 79 and 75% had access to cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), respectively. Less than half (47%) had access to myocardial biopsy, and only 5% used this test routinely. CMR was performed within 7 days of presentation in 73% of cases. Non-ischaemic late gadolinium enhancement (LGE, 88%) and high-signal intensity in T2-weighted images (74%) were the most used diagnostic criteria for AM. CCTA was preferred to coronary angiography by 47% of participants to exclude coronary artery disease. Systematic prescription of beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors was reported by 38 and 32% of participants. Around a quarter of participants declared considering LGE burden as a reason to treat. Most participants (90%) reported performing a follow-up echocardiogram, while 63% scheduled a follow-up CMR. The main reason for treatment discontinuation was improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction (89%), followed by LGE regression (60%). In two-thirds of participants, the decision to resume high-intensity sport was influenced by residual LGE. Conclusion This survey confirms the high utilization of cardiac imaging in AM but reveals major differences in how cardiac imaging is used and how the condition is managed between centres, underlining the need for recommendation statements in this topic.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the current role of cardiac imaging in the diagnosis, management, and follow - up of acute myocarditis (AM). Through a survey by the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), the researchers hope to understand the practical differences in the use of cardiovascular multi - modal imaging techniques in different medical centers and how these differences affect the management of patients with acute myocarditis. In addition, this study also aims to reveal the uncertainties faced by doctors in the diagnosis and treatment of acute myocarditis in the absence of clear guidelines, thereby providing a basis for formulating relevant recommendations. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following aspects: - The frequency and mode of application of cardiac imaging techniques (such as echocardiography, cardiac CT angiography [CCTA], cardiac magnetic resonance [CMR], etc.) in the diagnosis of acute myocarditis. - The situation of endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) in medical institutions. Although it is considered the gold standard for diagnosis, its practical application is limited due to problems such as invasiveness and sampling bias. - The use of different imaging techniques (especially CMR sequences, such as late gadolinium enhancement [LGE], high - signal intensity in T2 - weighted images, etc.) in the diagnosis of acute myocarditis. - How to use the results of cardiac imaging to guide initial treatment and monitoring, for example, whether it is necessary to rule out coronary artery disease (CAD), whether to consider specific treatment regimens, etc. - The follow - up strategy for patients with acute myocarditis after treatment, including when to stop cardioprotective drug treatment and the criteria for athletes to return to high - intensity exercise. Through the exploration of these issues, the paper hopes to provide data support and theoretical basis for formulating clinical guidelines and recommendations for acute myocarditis in the future.