P1081 Pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of the ustekinumab biosimilar candidate ABP 654 in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis

V Chow,D T Mytych,A Blauvelt,K Papp,C Barragan,P Yamauchi,J Crowley,J Franklin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.1211
2024-01-01
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
Abstract:Abstract Background ABP 654 is being developed as a biosimilar candidate to ustekinumab reference product (RP), a biologic agent used in the treatment of certain chronic, immune-mediated, inflammatory diseases. Previously, we reported no clinically meaningful differences in efficacy or safety between ABP 654 and ustekinumab RP in a 52-week randomised, double-blinded, active-controlled study in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Here, we describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) and anti-drug antibody (ADA) results from the same study. Methods A total of 563 patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive ABP 654 or ustekinumab RP at a subcutaneous dose of 45 mg (baseline body weight [BW] ≤ 100 kg) or 90 mg (baseline BW > 100 kg) (Fig. 1). Serum samples for PK and ADA evaluations were collected at various timepoints. Concentrations of ABP 654 and ustekinumab RP were measured using an electrochemiluminescent (ECL) assay based on the Meso Scale Discovery platform. All ADA samples were tested in a validated binding, acid-dissociation ECL assay. Samples testing positive for binding antibodies were evaluated for neutralising ADA in a validated ECL-based affinity capture elution assay. Results From baseline to Week 52, the geometric least-squares (LS) means of trough serum concentrations were similar between the ABP 654 and ustekinumab RP groups. In addition, the geometric LS means of serum concentrations were similar post Week 28 for patients (ABP 654, n=25 and ustekinumab RP, n=34) who received dose intensification. Of patients with a post-baseline ADA result through Week 28, 52 (18.6%) patients in the ABP 654 group and 104 (37.1%) patients in the ustekinumab RP group tested positive for binding ADAs. Of these, 24 (8.6%) patients in the ABP 654 group and 50 (17.9%) patients in the ustekinumab RP group tested positive for neutralising ADAs. For dose intensification patients with a post-baseline result post Week 28, no patients in the ABP 654 group tested positive for binding or neutralising ADAs, and 2 (5.9%) patients in the ustekinumab RP group tested positive for binding and neutralising ADAs. Conclusion Throughout the study, serum trough concentrations remained comparable between ABP 654 and ustekinumab RP. While the percentages of binding and neutralising ADAs were numerically lower for the ABP 654 group compared with the ustekinumab RP group through Week 28 (and in patients who received dose intensification), the available clinical efficacy, safety, and PK data suggest that these differences were not clinically impactful. Overall, the results support a conclusion of no clinically meaningful differences between ABP 654 and ustekinumab RP.
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?