Abstract:Background: Although machine learning is a promising tool for making prognoses, the performance of machine learning in predicting outcomes after stroke remains to be examined. Objective: This study aims to examine how much data-driven models with machine learning improve predictive performance for poststroke outcomes compared with conventional stroke prognostic scores and to elucidate how explanatory variables in machine learning-based models differ from the items of the stroke prognostic scores. Methods: We used data from 10,513 patients who were registered in a multicenter prospective stroke registry in Japan between 2007 and 2017. The outcomes were poor functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score >2) and death at 3 months after stroke. Machine learning-based models were developed using all variables with regularization methods, random forests, or boosted trees. We selected 3 stroke prognostic scores, namely, ASTRAL (Acute Stroke Registry and Analysis of Lausanne), PLAN (preadmission comorbidities, level of consciousness, age, neurologic deficit), and iScore (Ischemic Stroke Predictive Risk Score) for comparison. Item-based regression models were developed using the items of these 3 scores. The model performance was assessed in terms of discrimination and calibration. To compare the predictive performance of the data-driven model with that of the item-based model, we performed internal validation after random splits of identical populations into 80% of patients as a training set and 20% of patients as a test set; the models were developed in the training set and were validated in the test set. We evaluated the contribution of each variable to the models and compared the predictors used in the machine learning-based models with the items of the stroke prognostic scores. Results: The mean age of the study patients was 73.0 (SD 12.5) years, and 59.1% (6209/10,513) of them were men. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves and the area under the precision-recall curves for predicting poststroke outcomes were higher for machine learning-based models than for item-based models in identical populations after random splits. Machine learning-based models also performed better than item-based models in terms of the Brier score. Machine learning-based models used different explanatory variables, such as laboratory data, from the items of the conventional stroke prognostic scores. Including these data in the machine learning-based models as explanatory variables improved performance in predicting outcomes after stroke, especially poststroke death. Conclusions: Machine learning-based models performed better in predicting poststroke outcomes than regression models using the items of conventional stroke prognostic scores, although they required additional variables, such as laboratory data, to attain improved performance. Further studies are warranted to validate the usefulness of machine learning in clinical settings.

Stratified predictions of upper limb motor outcomes after stroke

Validating a Predictive Model of Acute Advanced Imaging Biomarkers in Ischemic Stroke

Prediction of Poststroke Depression Based on the Outcomes of Machine Learning Algorithms

Machine Learning Methods Predict Individual Upper-Limb Motor Impairment Following Therapy in Chronic Stroke

Early Functional MRI Activation Predicts Motor Outcome after Ischemic Stroke: a Longitudinal, Multimodal Study

Predictors for Upper-Limb Functional Recovery Trajectory in Individuals Receiving Stroke Rehabilitation: A Secondary Analysis of Data from Randomized Controlled Trials

Machine Learning for Predicting Motor Improvement After Acute Subcortical Infarction Using Baseline Whole Brain Volumes

Predicting later categories of upper limb activity from earlier clinical assessments following stroke: an exploratory analysis

Predicting post-stroke motor recovery of upper extremity using clinical variables and performance assays: A prospective cohort study protocol

Differences in motor network reorganization between patients with good and poor upper extremity impairment outcomes after stroke

Abstract TMP72: Multimodal Prediction Of Stroke Severity

Point of View on Outcome Prediction Models in Post-Stroke Motor Recovery

Machine Learning–Based Model for Prediction of Outcomes in Acute Stroke

Predicting Improved Daily Use of the More Affected Arm Poststroke Following Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy

Development and External Validation of Motor-intention Integrated Prediction Model for Upper Extremity Motor Recovery After Intention-driven Robotic-hand Training for Chronic Stroke

Stratifying chronic stroke patients based on the influence of contralesional motor cortices: An inter-hemispheric inhibition study

Combining clinical and imaging data for predicting functional outcomes after acute ischemic stroke: an automated machine learning approach

A Multimodal Ensemble Deep Learning Model for Functional Outcome Prognosis of Stroke Patients

Machine learning prediction of motor function in chronic stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Predictive Performance of Machine Learning-Based Models for Poststroke Clinical Outcomes in Comparison With Conventional Prognostic Scores: Multicenter, Hospital-Based Observational Study

Clinical machine learning predicting best stroke rehabilitation responders to exoskeletal robotic gait rehabilitation