Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To study clinical effects of double plating through different approaches for communicated and obvious osteoporosis periprosthetic femoral fracture following total knee arthroplasty(TKA). METHODS:From July 2010 to June 2017, 21 patients with periprosthetic femoral fracture following TKA were divided into two groups according to operative approach. Fifteen patients in medial and lateral double approaches group, including 5 males and 10 females aged from 63 to 79 years old with an average of (67.2±5.9) years old; 11 patients were type 33-A2 and 4 patients were type 33-A3 according to AO-OTA classification; 12 patients injured by falling down and 3 patients by traffic accident; treated with double plating. Six patients in medial parapatellar approach group, including 3 males and 3 females, aged from 61 to 74 years old with an average of (64.6±6.0) years old; 3 patients were type 33-A2 and 3 patients were type 33-A3 according to AO-OTA classification; 5 patients injured by falling down and 1 patient by traffic accident; treated with double plating. Operative time, blood loss, postoperative drainage, fracture healing time were compared between two groups; HSS score and radiology at 3 and 12 months were compared between two groups. RESULTS:All patients were followed up, and the follow-up time of bilateral approaches group ranged from 12 to 18 months with an average of (14.2±2.6 ) months, while the follow-up time of single approach group ranged from 12 to 16 months with an average of (12.6±2.5) months, and there was no statistical difference between two groups. The operative time and postoperative drainage in bilateral approaches group were (107.2±10.4) min and (213.9±30.4) ml, while in sigle approach group was (95.4±12.8) min and (256.8±34.2) ml, and the differences were significant(P<0.05). There were no significant difference in blood loss and fracture healing time(P>0.05). HHS score at 3 and 12 months after operation in bilateral approach were 82.9±5.7 and 84.8±7.1, while in single approach group were 83.6±6.1 and 86.3±6.8; there was no statistical difference in HSS score between two groups(P>0.05). According to HSS score at 12 months after operation, 2 cases got excellent results and 13 good in bilateral approaches group; 1 case got excellent result and 4 good and 1 moderate in single approach group; but there was no statistical difference between two groups (χ²=2.625, P=0.105). There wase no significant differences in complications between bilateral approaches group(2 cases) and single approach group (1 case)(P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Double plating technique for communicated and obvious osteoporosis periprosthetic femoral fracture following TKA could obtain good function of knee joint. The medial parapatellar approach has shorter operative time, while the bilateral approaches had less drainage.

Periprosthetic fractures are osteoporotic fractures: missed opportunities for osteoporosis diagnosis

[Risk factors and prevention strategies for periprosthetic femoral fractures in hip arthroplasty]

Patients with Periprosthetic Femoral Hip Fractures are Commonly Classified as Having Osteoporosis Based on DXA Measurements

Case report: A 10 years follow-up of periprosthetic femoral fracture after total hip arthroplasty in osteopetrosis.

The incidence of postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture following total hip replacement: An analysis of UK National Joint Registry and Hospital Episodes statistics data

Risk Factors Affecting the Incidence of Postoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture in Primary Hip Arthroplasty Patients: a Retrospective Study

Influential Factors in Bisphosphonates for Periprosthetic Bone Loss after Total Joint Arthroplasty

Are periprosthetic hip fractures more severe than native hip fractures? A systematic review of outcomes and resource utilization

Health status after periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures

Who Is Treating Periprosthetic Femur Fractures? An Analysis of the Periprosthetic Research Consortium

[Double Plating Through Different Approaches for Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture Following Total Knee Arthroplasty].

KNEE PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES IN THE ELDERLY: CURRENT CONCEPT

What are the predisposing factors for periprosthetic fractures following total hip arthroplasty? – a National Inpatient Sample-based study

Risk factors for mortality in periprosthetic femur fractures about the hip-a retrospective analysis

Early Periprosthetic Femur Fractures After Primary Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty: High Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Subsequent Reoperation

Some problems of periprosthetic fracture after total hip arthroplasty

Clinical differences between periprosthetic and native distal femur fractures: a comparative observational study

Periprosthetic distal femur fractures around total knee replacements: A comprehensive review

Clinical study of occult fractures around the prosthesis in primary total hip arthroplasty

Fixation or Revision for Periprosthetic Fractures: Epidemiology, New Trends, and Projections in the United States

The Effect of Periprosthetic Fractures Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty on Long-Term Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life