Abstract:Abstract Background and aims Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) is a well-established phenomenon and several protocols have shown acceptable between-subject reliability [based on intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values] in pain-free controls. Recently, it was recommended that future CPM test-retest reliability studies should explicitly report CPM reliability based on CPM responders and non-responders (within-subject reliability) based on measurement error of the test stimulus. Identification of reliable CPM paradigms based on responders and non-responders may be a step towards using CPM as a mechanistic marker in diagnosis and individualized pain management regimes. The primary aim of this paper is to investigate the frequency of CPM responders/non-responders, and to quantify the agreements in the classification of responders/non-responders between 2 different days for 10 different CPM protocols. Methods Data from a previous study investigating reliability of CPM protocols in healthy subjects was used. In 26 healthy men, the test-stimuli used on both days were: Pain thresholds to electrical stimulation, heat stimulation, manual algometry, and computer-controlled cuff algometry as well as pain tolerance to cuff algometry. Two different conditioning stimuli (CS; cold water immersion and a computer-controlled tourniquet) were used in a randomized and counterbalanced order in both sessions. CPM responders were defined as a larger increase in the test stimulus response during the CS than the standard error of measurement (SEM) for the test-stimuli between repeated baseline tests without CS. Results Frequency of responders and non-responders showed large variations across protocols. Across the studied CPM protocols, a large proportion (from 11.5 to 73.1%) of subjects was classified as CPM non-responders when the test stimuli standard error of measurements (SEM) was considered as classifier. The combination of manual pressure algometry and cold water immersion induced a CPM effect in most participants on both days ( n =16). However, agreement in the classification of CPM responders versus non-responders between days was only significant when assessed with computer-controlled pressure pain threshold as test-stimulus and tourniquet cuff as CS (κ=0.36 [95% CI, 0.04–0.68], p =0.037). Conclusions and implications Agreements in classification of CPM responders/non-responders using SEM as classifier between days were generally poor suggesting considerable intra-individual variation in CPM. The most reliable paradigm was computer-controlled pressure pain threshold as test-stimulus and tourniquet cuff as conditioning stimulus. However while this CPM protocol had the greatest degree of agreement of classification of CPM responders and non-responders across days, this protocol also failed to induce a CPM response in more than half of the sample. In contrast, the commonly used combination of manual pressure algometry and cold water immersion induced a CPM effect in most participants however it was inconsistent in doing so. Further exploration of the two paradigms and classification of responders and non-responders in a larger heterogeneous sample also including women would further inform the clinical usefulness of these CPM protocols. Future research in this area may be an important step towards using CPM as a mechanistic marker in diagnosis and in developing individualized pain management regimes.

Exploring the Impact of Affinity and Unpleasantness on Conditioned Pain Modulation among Healthy Individuals

Understanding inter-individual variability of experimental pain habituation and conditioned pain modulation in healthy individuals

Comparison between Conditioned Pain Modulation Paradigms Using Cold Pressor Conditioning Stimulus versus Ischemic Pressure Stimulus in Women with Fibromyalgia and Its Impact on Clinical Status: A Cross-Sectional Study

Expectation of analgesia increases the inhibitory response of conditioned pain modulation in healthy participants who at baseline have a non‐inhibitory profile

A psychophysical study comparing massage to conditioned pain modulation: A single blind randomized controlled trial in healthy participants

Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) paradigm type affects its sensitivity as a biomarker of fibromyalgia

Three Crossover Trials Investigating the Effects of Manual Pressure

Adaptability to pain is associated with potency of local pain inhibition, but not conditioned pain modulation: a healthy human study

Reliability of conditioned pain modulation in healthy individuals and chronic pain patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Pain-related cognitions and emotional distress are not associated with conditioned pain modulation: an explorative analysis of 1142 participants with acute, subacute, and chronic pain

Cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of conditioned pain modulation and pain in fibromyalgia: CPM as an effect modifier of pain changes over time

Assessment of CPM reliability: quantification of the within-subject reliability of 10 different protocols

How Does Conditioned Pain Modulation Influence Motor Imagery Processes in Women with Fibromyalgia Syndrome? A Cross-Sectional Study Secondary Analysis

Effectiveness of cognitive reappraisal and distraction for induced acute pain: A laboratory study.

Effects of conditioned pain modulation on Capsaicin-induced spreading muscle hyperalgesia in humans

The association between conditioned pain modulation and psychological factors in people with chronic spinal pain: A systematic review

The Effect of Social Observational Learning, Empathy and Catastrophizing in Chronic Pain Patients During Acute Pain Induction

The effect of dysmenorrhea severity and interference on reactions to experimentally-induced pain

Impaired somatosensory habituation in older adults with chronic pain during an affective oddball task

Pain sensitization and pain-related psychological factors in patients with temporomandibular disorders: an observational cross-sectional study

Effects of Executive Functions and Cognitive Variables in Experimentally Induced Acute Pain Perception during a Distraction Task: A Study on Asymptomatic Pain-Free Individuals