Misconceptions of the marine biological carbon pump in a changing climate: Thinking outside the "export" box

Ivy Frenger,Angela Landolfi,Karin Kvale,Christopher J. Somes,Andreas Oschlies,Wanxuan Yao,Wolfgang Koeve
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17124
IF: 11.6
2024-01-09
Global Change Biology
Abstract:The marine biological carbon pump (BCP) stores carbon in the ocean interior, locked away from exchange with the atmosphere. The BCP is commonly equated with the flux of organic material to the ocean interior, termed "export flux," and a change in export flux is perceived to impact marine carbon storage and atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2). Here, we recap that export flux lacks a direct relationship with atmospheric CO2. Using instead the storage of carbon of biological origin as a metric can explain a seemingly paradoxical response: Despite a decrease in export flux, the BCP provides a negative feedback to increasing atmospheric CO2. The marine biological carbon pump (BCP) stores carbon in the ocean interior, isolating it from exchange with the atmosphere and thereby coregulating atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2). As the BCP commonly is equated with the flux of organic material to the ocean interior, termed "export flux," a change in export flux is perceived to directly impact atmospheric CO2, and thus climate. Here, we recap how this perception contrasts with current understanding of the BCP, emphasizing the lack of a direct relationship between global export flux and atmospheric CO2. We argue for the use of the storage of carbon of biological origin in the ocean interior as a diagnostic that directly relates to atmospheric CO2, as a way forward to quantify the changes in the BCP in a changing climate. The diagnostic is conveniently applicable to both climate model data and increasingly available observational data. It can explain a seemingly paradoxical response under anthropogenic climate change: Despite a decrease in export flux, the BCP intensifies due to a longer reemergence time of biogenically stored carbon back to the ocean surface and thereby provides a negative feedback to increasing atmospheric CO2. This feedback is notably small compared with anthropogenic CO2 emissions and other carbon‐climate feedbacks. In this Opinion paper, we advocate for a comprehensive view of the BCP's impact on atmospheric CO2, providing a prerequisite for assessing the effectiveness of marine CO2 removal approaches that target marine biology.
environmental sciences,biodiversity conservation,ecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?