Abstract:General relativity makes the dramatic prediction that a sufficiently dense cloud of matter collapses to a black hole—a spacetime singularity surrounded by a horizon. A classical observer can enter a large horizon with no ill effects, but the causal structure of a black hole spacetime is such that she cannot return from beyond. Black holes have a mass (M), they can carry electrical or magnetic charge (Q), and can rotate (with angular momentum J). But beyond these characteristics, they “have no hair,” i.e., they have no other distinguishing classical characteristics. To be gravitationally stable, the mass of a charged or rotating black hole must exceed a so-called extremal bound, e.g., rotating black holes, also known as Kerr black holes [1], satisfy the relation GM2 ≥ |J|. Long a staple of science fiction, there is now a significant body of evidence that black holes, or at least objects very like them, exist in our universe at the centers of galaxies and as endpoints of stellar collapse. One of the most curious properties of black holes is the enormous entropy that they carry. Gedanken experiments carried out since the early 1970s [2, 3] have established that a black hole of horizon area A should respond to probes as if it were a thermodynamic object with an entropy S = A/4GN h̄, where GN is the Newton constant and h̄ is Planck’s constant. (Here we have adopted units in which we set the speed of light and Boltzmann’s constant to 1). Thus a solar mass black hole (about 6 kilometers wide) should have an entropy that is 22 orders of magnitude greater than the entropy of the sun itself. We have known since Boltzmann, that entropy in a physical system is a manifestation of statistical degeneracy of the underlying states. Following Boltzmann then, a central question for a quantum theory of gravity is to explain how black holes contrive to have an underlying statistical degeneracy of eA/4GN h̄. Since the area of an astrophysical black hole grows as the mass squared, this is a truly staggering degeneracy. Measured by an apparatus with energy resolution ∆E, this implies a microstate level spacing proportional to ∆M ∼ ∆Ee−A/4GN h̄. It has been argued [4] that the difficulty of resolving such minuscule differences in the h̄ → 0 limit is the source of the apparent semiclassical paradox [5] of loss of quantum unitarity in black holes. Thus a key challenge to any quantum theory of gravity is to identify the “atoms of spacetime” that can explain such a spectacular growth in the number of microstates. For a special class of highly symmetric, near-extremal charged black holes, this problem was solved in string theory by Strominger and Vafa [6]. With hindsight, we now know that a key ingredient in their solution was that the physics of near-extremal black holes is largely controlled by properties of the spacetime in the vicinity of, but outside, the black hole horizon. Within this so-called black hole “throat” (see Fig. 1, left) the geometry takes a universal form—it is an anti-de Sitter (AdS) spacetime, namely the same geometry as a solution to Einstein’s equations with a negative cosmological constant. In a celebrated paper, Maldacena argued that quantum gravity in every such spacetime is equivalent or “holographically dual” to a nongravitating, conformally invariant, quantum field theory (CFT) in a lower number of dimensions [7] (Fig. 1, right). This idea, the AdS/CFT correspondence, has some analogy to optical holograms, where the image of a three-dimensional object can be stored nonlocally in a two-dimensional piece of film and then recreated with coherent light. In the context of the AdS/CFT correspondence, spacetime itself is an emergent phenomenon, simply a convenient rewriting of the immensely complicated, strongly coupled physics of a conventional local quantum field theory defined on the boundary of spacetime (Fig. 1, right). The radial direction of spacetime appears as a geometric realization of the renormalization group scale of the field theory [8]. A black hole in anti-de Sitter spacetime is then simply described in the holographic dual theory as a thermal

Black holes, white holes, and near-horizon physics

Black holes, white holes, and near-horizon physics

Black Hole Horizons and their Mechanics

Black holes as spherically-symmetric horizon-bound objects

Farewell to black hole horizons and singularities?

Black holes and the nature of the event horizon

Are black holes really two dimensional ?

Evolving Black Hole Horizons in General Relativity and Alternative Gravity

Black Holes Up Close

Black Holes Inside and Out 2024: visions for the future of black hole physics

Black holes to white holes II: quasi-classical scenarios for white hole evolution

Black holes in classical general relativity and beyond

Black holes reconsidered

White holes as remnants: a surprising scenario for the end of a black hole

Embedding Black Holes and Other Inhomogeneities in the Universe in Various Theories of Gravity: A Short Review

Schrödinger and Klein-Gordon theories of black holes from the quantization of the Oppenheimer and Snyder gravitational collapse

Non-isolated dynamic black holes and white holes

After collapse: On how a physical vacuum can change the black hole paradigm

Horizon-bound objects: Kerr-Vaidya solutions

Circumventing Quantum Gravity: Black Holes Evaporating into Macroscopic Wormholes

Quantum black hole physics from the event horizon