Abstract:The recent development of the so-called network science reveals the underlying structures of complex networks and thus serves as a catalyst for the rising voice of interdisciplinary studies to tame complexity (Strogatz, 2001; Newman, 2003; Albert and Barabási, 2002; Boccalettia et al., 2006). The small-world network model proposed by Watts and Strogatz (1998) quantitatively depicts that most real networks are small worlds which have high clustering and short average path length. The “six degrees of separation,” uncovered by the social psychologist Milgram (1967), is the most famous manifestation of small-world theory. The real world, however, significantly deviates from the classic Erdös-Rényi model, in the sense that the degree distribution is right-skewed, that is to say, it follows a power law other than the Poisson distribution (Erdős and Rényi, 1959, 1960; Barabási and Albert, 1999). In particular, for most networks, including the World Wide Web (WWW), the Internet, and metabolic networks, the degree distribution has a power-law tail. Such networks are called scale free, and the Barabási-Albert (BA) model provides a possible generating mechanism for such scale-free structures: growth and preferential attachment (Barabási and Albert, 1999). These pioneering discoveries attract growing interest of researchers from different backgrounds. Besides, real networks are hierarchical and have community structures or are composed of the elements — motifs (Newman, 2006; Milo et al., 2002). Surprisingly, it is found that complex networks are self-similar, corresponding to the ubiquitous geometric pattern in snowflakes (Song et al., 2005). Meanwhile, the dynamics taking place on complex networks such as virus spreading, information propagation, synchronization, evolutionary games, and cooperation have been deeply investigated and well understood (Watts, 1999; Huang et al., 2006; Pastor-Satorras and Vespignani, 2001; Acebrón et al., 2005; Barahona and Pecora, 2002; Motter et al., 2005; Zhou and Kurths, 2006; Santos and Pacheco, 2005).

Social centralization and semantic collapse: Hyperbolic embeddings of networks and text

Social Connection Induces Cultural Contraction: Evidence from Hyperbolic Embeddings of Social and Semantic Networks

Geometry of the Space of Partitioned Networks: A Unified Theoretical and Computational Framework

Machine learning meets network science: dimensionality reduction for fast and efficient embedding of networks in the hyperbolic space

A cognitively driven weighted-entropy model for embedding semantic categories in hyperbolic geometry

Uncovering the hidden core-periphery structure in hyperbolic networks

How networks shape diversity for better or worse

Hypernetwork Science: From Multidimensional Networks to Computational Topology

Decomposing social and semantic networks in emerging "big data" research.

Structural Diversity and Homophily: A Study Across More than One Hundred Big Networks

The Geometry of Culture: Analyzing Meaning through Word Embeddings

Optimisation of the coalescent hyperbolic embedding of complex networks

Topological properties and organizing principles of semantic networks

Architecture and evolution of semantic networks in mathematics texts

Information Propagation and Self-Organized Consensus in the Blogosphere

Structure of Heterogeneous Networks

Centralized nucleation in online networks leads to high social inequality

Fractal information dissemination and clustering evolution on social hypernetwork

Opinion disparity in hypergraphs with community structure

Opinion Dynamics on Complex Networks