Abstract:INTRODUCTION Many of the procedures for estimating and assessing causal effects under unconfoundedness involve the propensity score. In practice it is rare that we know the propensity score a priori in settings other than those involving randomized experiments. Such practical settings could have complex designs where the unit-level probabilities differ in known ways. An example is the allocation of admissions to students applying for medical school in The Netherlands in the 1980s and 1990s. Based on high school grades, applicants would be assigned a priority score that determined their probability of getting admitted to medical school. The actual admission to medical school was then based on a (random) lottery. Such settings are rare, however, and a more common situation is where, given the pre-treatment variables available, a researcher views unconfoundedness as a reasonable approximation to the actual assignment mechanism, with only vague a priori information about the form of the dependence of the propensity score on the observed pre-treatment variables. For example, in many medical settings, decisions are based on a set of clinically relevant patient characteristics observed by doctors and entered in patients’ medical records. However, there is typically no explicit rule that requires physicians to choose a specific treatment based on particular values of the pre-treatment variables. In light of this degree of physician discretion, there is no explicitly known form for the propensity score. In such cases, for at least some of the methods for estimating and assessing treatment effects discussed in this part of the book, the researcher needs to estimate the propensity score. In this chapter we discuss some specific methods for doing so. It is important to note that the various methods that will be discussed in the chapters following this one, specifically Chapters 14–17, use the propensity score in different ways. Some of these methods rely more heavily than others on an accurate approximation of the true propensity score by the estimated propensity score.

The Propensity Score with Continuous Treatments

Causal inference for multiple continuous exposures via the multivariate generalized propensity score

Estimating generalized propensity scores with survey and attrition weighted data

Contrast Specific Propensity Scores

Outcome-Adjusted Balance Measure for Generalized Propensity Score Model Selection

Propensity score analysis for time-dependent exposure

Propensity Score Method: a Non-Parametric Technique to Reduce Model Dependence

Balance Diagnostics after Propensity Score Matching.

Estimating the Propensity Score

Causal Effect Estimation after Propensity Score Trimming with Continuous Treatments

Propensity Score Analysis with Guaranteed Subgroup Balance

The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects

Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples

Using generalized doubly robust estimator to estimate average treatment effects of multiple treatments in observational studies

Simultaneous Conformal Prediction of Missing Outcomes with Propensity Score $ε$-Discretization

Uniformly Semiparametric Ecient Estimation of Treatment Eects with a Continuous Treatment

Estimating and Using Propensity Scores with Partially Missing Data

Using Propensity Scores to Estimate Effects of Treatment Initiation Decisions: State of the Science

Isotonic propensity score matching

Propensity score weighting for causal inference with multiple treatments

Calibrated and Conformal Propensity Scores for Causal Effect Estimation