Abstract:Abstract Background There is increased interest in using narratives or storytelling to influence health policies. We aimed to systematically review the evidence on the use of narratives to impact the health policy-making process. Methods Eligible study designs included randomised studies, non-randomised studies, process evaluation studies, economic studies, qualitative studies, stakeholder analyses, policy analyses, and case studies. The MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), WHO Global Health Library, Communication and Mass Media Complete, and Google Scholar databases were searched. We followed standard systematic review methodology for study selection, data abstraction and risk of bias assessment. We synthesised the findings narratively and presented the results stratified according to the following stages of the policy cycle: (1) agenda-setting, (2) policy formulation, (3) policy adoption, (4) policy implementation and (5) policy evaluation. Additionally, we presented the knowledge gaps relevant to using narrative to impact health policy-making. Results Eighteen studies met the eligibility criteria, and included case studies ( n = 15), participatory action research ( n = 1), documentary analysis ( n = 1) and biographical method ( n = 1). The majority were of very low methodological quality. In addition, none of the studies formally evaluated the effectiveness of the narrative-based interventions. Findings suggest that narratives may have a positive influence when used as inspiration and empowerment tools to stimulate policy inquiries, as educational and awareness tools to initiate policy discussions and gain public support, and as advocacy and lobbying tools to formulate, adopt or implement policy. There is also evidence of undesirable effects of using narratives. In one case study, narrative use led to widespread insurance reimbursement of a therapy for breast cancer that was later proven to be ineffective. Another case study described how the use of narrative inappropriately exaggerated the perceived risk of a procedure, which led to limiting its use and preventing a large number of patients from its benefits. A third case study described how optimistic ‘cure’ or ‘hope’ stories of children with cancer were selectively used to raise money for cancer research that ignored the negative realities. The majority of included studies did not provide information on the definition or content of narratives, the theoretical framework underlying the narrative intervention or the possible predictors of the success of narrative interventions. Conclusion The existing evidence base precludes any robust inferences about the impact of narrative interventions on health policy-making. We discuss the implications of the findings for research and policy. Trial registration The review protocol is registered in PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews (ID = CRD42018085011 ).

Using narrative literature reviews to build a scientific knowledge base

Quantitative alternatives to narrative reviews for understanding existing research literature

Narrative research in sport and exercise science in the early 21st century: a state-of-the-art critical review

Writing narrative style literature reviews

Narrative reanalysis: A methodological framework for a new brand of reviews

A Guided Tour of Literature Review: Facilitating Academic Paper Reading with Narrative Visualization.

Literature Reviews for Education and Nursing Graduate Students

Narrative Medicine: theory, clinical practice and education - a scoping review

Reviewing the animal literature: how to describe and choose between different types of literature reviews

Current Technology Developments Can Improve the Quality of Research and Level of Evidence for Rehabilitation Interventions: A Narrative Review

Using narratives to impact health policy-making: a systematic review

Designing studies and reviews to produce informative, trustworthy evidence about complex interventions in rehabilitation: a narrative review and commentary

Content and outcomes of narrative medicine programmes: a systematic review of the literature through 2019

Exploring Optimal Models for Non-Inpatient Rehabilitation Services through a Narrative Review

The Literature Review Network: An Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Systematic Literature Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Method Development

The use of systematic reviews for conducting new studies in physiotherapy research: a meta-research study comparing author guidelines of physiotherapy-related journals

Storytelling as an intervention in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: a scoping review

Use of conversational agents in rehabilitation following brain injury, disease, or stroke: a scoping review protocol

Innovative Exercise for Nursing PhD Students: Addressing Biases During Integrative Literature Reviews

FC35: The use of narrative approaches to improve quality of care in the long-term care setting: a scoping review

An Overview of How to Search and Write a Medical Literature Review