The Value Of Combined Assessment Of Hepatojugular Reflux And Jugular Venous Pressure In Heart Failure

Hatem Hassaballa,Hesham Omar,Maya Guglin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.10.244

IF: 6.592

2024-01-01

Journal of Cardiac Failure

Abstract:Introduction There has been a decline in emphasis on the value of physical examination in heart failure (HF). The presence and extent of jugular venous distension (JVD) and positive hepatojugular reflux (HJR) are among the best tools to identify acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) clinically and correlate well with objective markers of congestion. We investigated the value of combined assessment of hepatojugular reflux (HJR) and jugular venous distension (JVD) in acute HF. Hypothesis Heart failure patients with a positive HJR and JVD will have more clinically evident congestion. Methods This is a retrospective analysis of the Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmonary Artery Catheterization Effectiveness (ESCAPE) trial. The trial data was utilized to study the characteristic of patients with positive HJR versus those without JVD. Inclusion criteria included patients with New York Heart Association class IV symptoms and a left ventricular ejection fraction <30%, three months of symptoms despite appropriate therapy, a systolic blood pressure <125 mmHg, and at least one symptom and sign of congestion. Exclusion criteria included cases with creatinine > 3.5 mg/dL and those who required dobutamine/dopamine 3 g/kg/min or milrinone before randomization. Results Among 327 patients with documented HJR and jugular venous pressure (JVP), 306 (93.6%) had a positive HJR and JVD, while 21 (6.4%) had a positive HJR without JVD. In contrast with patients with a positive HJR and JVD, those with a positive HJR and no JVD had less degree of congestion evident clinically in the lower frequency of peripheral edema (P=0.02), ascites (P=0.011), hepatomegaly (P<0.001) S3 gallop (P<0.001), lower pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (P=0.018), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (P=0.027), pulmonary artery diastolic pressure (P=0.003), and right atrial pressure (P<0.001), lower inferior vena cava size during inspiration (P=0.005) and expiration (p=0.003) with a higher collapsibility index (P=0.009), and required lower furosemide dose in-hospital (P=0.002). Figure 1 shows patients with JVP <8 mmHg, a positive HJR was found in 58.3% of the subjects. This highlights that an essential value of a positive HJR resides in a subset of patients with HF and modest volume overload in whom JVD is not yet evident and in which the HJR unmasked a venous compartment at its maximal threshold prior. 7 to overt JVD. We suspect at this volume level; diuretics dosage should be increased to prevent more overt heart failure and possibly avoid hospitalization. Conclusion The combined evaluation of the HJR and JVP identified two clinically distinct groups of advanced HF patients with significantly different degrees of congestion and diuretic requirements.

cardiac & cardiovascular systems