Precision molecular insights for prostate cancer prognosis: tumor immune microenvironment and cell death analysis of senescence-related genes by machine learning and single-cell analysis
Yuni Wu,Ran Xu,Jing Wang,Zhibin Luo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-024-01277-6
2024-09-27
Abstract:Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is a prevalent malignancy among men, primarily originating from the prostate epithelium. It ranks first in global cancer incidence and second in mortality rates, with a rising trend in China. PCa's subtle initial symptoms, such as urinary issues, necessitate diagnostic measures like digital rectal examination, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, and tissue biopsy. Advanced PCa management typically involves a multifaceted approach encompassing surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and hormonal therapy. The involvement of aging genes in PCa development and progression, particularly through the mTOR pathway, has garnered increasing attention. Methods: This study aimed to explore the association between aging genes and biochemical PCa recurrence and construct predictive models. Utilizing public gene expression datasets (GSE70768, GSE116918, and TCGA), we conducted extensive analyses, including Cox regression, functional enrichment, immune cell infiltration estimation, and drug sensitivity assessments. The constructed risk score model, based on aging-related genes (ARGs), demonstrated superior predictive capability for PCa prognosis compared to conventional clinical features. High-risk genes positively correlated with risk, while low-risk genes displayed a negative correlation. Results: An ARGs-based risk score model was developed and validated for predicting prognosis in prostate adenocarcinoma (PRAD) patients. LASSO regression analysis and cross-validation plots were employed to select ARGs with prognostic significance. The risk score outperformed traditional clinicopathological features in predicting PRAD prognosis, as evidenced by its high AUC (0.787). The model demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity, with AUC values of 0.67, 0.675, 0.696, and 0.696 at 1, 3, 5, and 8 years, respectively, in the GEO cohort. Similar AUC values were observed in the TCGA cohort at 1, 3, and 5 years (0.67, 0.659, 0.667, and 0.743). The model included 12 genes, with high-risk genes positively correlated with risk and low-risk genes negatively correlated. Conclusions: This study presents a robust ARGs-based risk score model for predicting biochemical recurrence in PCa patients, highlighting the potential significance of aging genes in PCa prognosis and offering enhanced predictive accuracy compared to traditional clinical parameters. These findings open new avenues for research on PCa recurrence prediction and therapeutic strategies.