Validation of Soil‐Test‐Based Phosphorus and Potassium Fertilizer Recommendations for Flood‐Irrigated Rice

Matthew S. Fryer,Nathan A. Slaton,Trenton L. Roberts,Jarrod T. Hardke,Richard J. Norman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2019.03.0159

IF: 2.65

2019-09-01

Agronomy Journal

Abstract:Soil testing is a widely accepted practice for evaluating soil-P and soil-K availability but can be inconsistent for making accurate fertilizer-P and fertilizer-K recommendations. Our research objectives were to assess the accuracy of established soil- and tissue-P and -K concentration interpretations for predicting flood-irrigated rice (Oryza sativa L.) yield response to fertilization at three levels of significance (p ≤ 0.05, 0.10, and 0.25). Six treatments combining two fertilizer-P rates (0 or 32 kg P ha–1) and four fertilizer-K rates (0, 56, 84, 112 kg K ha–1) were applied at 24 sites. Soil-test P (STP) interpretations were 40% accurate, regardless of the significance level, and whole-plant-P concentrations at the V6-V7 stage were 50% accurate. Soil-test K (STK) interpretations were 40 (p ≤ 0.05 and 0.10) and 36% (p ≤ 0.25) accurate, and whole-plant-K concentrations at the R2-R3 stage were 61% (p ≤ 0.25) or 62% (p ≤ 0.05 and 0.10) accurate in predicting the yield response to K fertilization. Nearly all of the error in both soil-test- and whole-plant-P and -K concentration interpretations occurred in the suboptimal categories. The accuracy (p ≤ 0.05) of yield response predictions for levels where no fertilizer was recommended was 100% for STP and 86% for STK and 82 to 100% for whole-plant-P and -K concentrations. The false-positive error was the most common soil-test recommendation inaccuracy and suggests that fertilizer recommendations are skewed to reduce the risk of yield loss from insufficient fertilization.

agronomy