Coordinating single‐cell and bulk RNA‐seq in deciphering the intratumoral immune landscape and prognostic stratification of prostate cancer patients

Zhou Sun,Jie Wang,Qiang Zhang,Xiangdi Meng,Zhaosen Ma,Jiqiang Niu,Rui Guo,Lisa Jia Tran,Jing Zhang,Yunfei Liu,Fangdie Ye,Baoluo Ma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.23928
IF: 4.109
2023-08-13
Environmental Toxicology
Abstract:Introduction Prostate cancer is a common cancer among male population. The aberrant expression of histone modifiers has been identified as a potential driving force in numerous cancer types. However, the mechanism of histone modifiers in the development of prostate cancer remains unknown. Methods Expression profiles and clinical data were obtained from GSE70769, GSE46602, and GSE67980. Seruat R package was utilized to calculate the gene set enrichment of the histone modification pathway and obtain the Histone score. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and Cox regression analyses were employed to identify marker genes with prognostic value. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy of the prognostic model. In addition, microenvironment cell populations counter (MCPcounter), single‐sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA), and xCell algorithms were employed for immune infiltration analysis. Drug sensitivity prediction was performed using oncoPredict R package. Results We screened differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between Histone‐high score (Histone‐H) and Histone‐low score (Histone‐L) groups, which were enriched in RNA splicing and DNA‐binding transcription factor binding pathways. We retained four prognostic marker genes, including TACC3, YWHAH, TAF1C and TTLL5. The risk model showed significant efficacy in stratification of the prognosis of prostate cancer patients in both internal and external cohorts (p
toxicology,environmental sciences,water resources
What problem does this paper attempt to address?