Abstract:To investigate the short-term effects and differences between exercise alone and exercise combined with self-mobilization training on chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP). Thirty subjects who met the criteria were recruited and randomly assigned to the exercise training group, the exercise combined with cervical self-mobilization training group (ECCM), and the exercise combined with cervicothoracic self-mobilization training group (ECCTM). The exercise training group received 6 weeks of deep neck flexor under biofeedback and scapular stability training, and the other two groups received 6 weeks of cervical self-mobilization and cervicothoracic self-mobilization, respectively, in addition to exercise training. Neck pain, cervical range of motion (ROM), neck disability, strength and endurance of deep neck flexor and quality of life were assessed before and after 6 weeks of training. The study results showed that all the three training programs for 6 weeks increased the strength and endurance of deep neck flexor, increased cervical ROM, reduced pain, and improved neck function (P < 0.05). The exercise combined with self-mobilization two groups compared with only the exercise training group had better improvement in ROM of extension, lateral flexion, rotation and quality of life (P < 0.05). Compared with exercise alone and exercise combined with cervical self-mobilization training, the exercise combined with cervicothoracic self-mobilization training was the best in improving ROM of right lateral flexion (exercise training group vs ECCTM: P < 0.01, d = 1.61, ECCM vs ECCTM: P < 0.05, d = 1.14) and pain (exercise training group vs ECCTM: P < 0.05, d = 1.34, ECCM vs ECCTM: P < 0.05, d = 1.23). Deep flexor muscle and shoulder stability training can improve the endurance and strength of the deep flexor muscles of the neck and coordinate the movement patterns of the shoulder and neck. Self-mobilization techniques can promote improvements in cervical lateral flexion and rotation range of motion, alleviate neck disability and further improve quality of life. A combination of exercise and cervicothoracic self-mobilization training appears beneficial for the management of neck pain.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the short - term effects and differences of individual exercise training and combined with cervical or cervicothoracic self - mobilization training on chronic non - specific neck pain (CNSNP). Specifically, the study focuses on the effects of these different training regimens on improving neck pain, cervical range of motion (ROM), strength and endurance of the deep neck flexors, dysfunction, and quality of life. ### Research Background - **Neck Pain Problem**: According to the Global Burden of Disease study, neck pain is the second most common musculoskeletal disorder and the third leading cause of reduced life expectancy in both men and women. Although symptoms may be alleviated, dysfunction still exists, increasing the likelihood of acute neck pain turning into chronic neck pain. - **Chronic Non - specific Neck Pain (CNSNP)**: CNSNP refers to neck pain with an unknown cause and symptoms lasting for more than 12 weeks. Its prevalence is increasing, especially among young people, which is related to the fast - paced modern society and changes in living and working conditions. - **Treatment Methods**: Currently, methods for treating neck pain include exercise training and spinal mobilization techniques. Exercise training can improve the strength and endurance of the deep neck flexors, while spinal mobilization techniques can improve joint range of motion and relieve pain. ### Research Objectives - **Evaluate the Effects of Different Training Regimens**: The study aims to evaluate the short - term effects and differences of individual exercise training and combined with cervical or cervicothoracic self - mobilization training on improving neck pain, cervical range of motion, strength and endurance of the deep neck flexors, dysfunction, and quality of life. - **Compare the Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Training Regimens**: By comparing the effects of different training regimens, determine which method is more effective for the management of chronic non - specific neck pain. ### Research Methods - **Design**: Single - blind, randomized controlled trial. - **Sample**: 47 subjects who met the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to three groups: the individual exercise training group, the combined cervical self - mobilization training group (ECCM), and the combined cervicothoracic self - mobilization training group (ECCTM). - **Interventions**: - **Individual Exercise Training Group**: Conducted 6 - week deep neck flexor biofeedback training and shoulder stability training. - **Combined Cervical Self - mobilization Training Group (ECCM)**: On the basis of individual exercise training, added 6 - week cervical self - mobilization training. - **Combined Cervicothoracic Self - mobilization Training Group (ECCTM)**: On the basis of individual exercise training, added 6 - week cervicothoracic self - mobilization training. - **Evaluation Indicators**: - Neck pain (VAS score) - Cervical range of motion (ROM) - Strength and endurance of the deep neck flexors - Dysfunction (NDI index) - Quality of life (SF - 36 scale) ### Results - **Neck Pain**: The VAS score of the combined cervicothoracic self - mobilization training group (ECCTM) was significantly lower than that of the other two groups. - **Cervical Range of Motion**: The combined cervicothoracic self - mobilization training group (ECCTM) performed best in right lateral flexion and rotational ROM. - **Strength and Endurance of the Deep Neck Flexors**: All three training regimens significantly improved the strength and endurance of the deep neck flexors. - **Dysfunction**: The combined cervicothoracic self - mobilization training group (ECCTM) had the most obvious improvement in dysfunction. - **Quality of Life**: The combined cervicothoracic self - mobilization training group (ECCTM) had the most significant improvement in quality of life. ### Conclusions - **Main Findings**: The regimen combined with cervicothoracic self - mobilization training showed better effects in improving neck pain, cervical range of motion, dysfunction, and quality of life. - **Clinical Significance**: The comprehensive treatment strategy combined with cervicothoracic self - mobilization training may be an effective method for managing chronic non - specific neck pain. Hope this information is helpful for you to understand this paper! If there are any further questions or need more detailed explanations, please feel free to let me know.

Effects of exercise combined with cervicothoracic spine self-mobilization on chronic non-specific neck pain

Effect of specific deep cervical muscle exercises on functional disability, pain intensity, craniovertebral angle, and neck-muscle strength in chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial

Effect of long-term cervical extensor exercise program on functional disability, pain intensity, range of motion, cervical muscle mass, and cervical curvature in young adult population with chronic non-specific neck pain: a randomized controlled trial

Cervicothoracic junction mobilization versus autogenic muscle energy technique for chronic mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial

The effect of McKenzie protocol vs. deep neck flexor and scapulothoracic exercises in subjects with chronic neck pain - a randomized controlled study.

Lumbar motor control training as a complementary treatment for chronic neck pain: A randomized controlled trial

Effectiveness of McKenzie exercises plus stabilization exercises versus McKenzie exercises alone on disability, pain, and range of motion in patients with nonspecific chronic neck pain: A randomized clinical trial

Effectiveness of Deep Cervical Fascial Manipulation® and Sequential Yoga Poses on Pain and Function in Individuals with Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Effect of sling exercise therapy on surface electromyography and muscle thickness of superficial cervical muscle groups in female patients with chronic neck pain

The Effects of cervical mobilization and clinical pilates exercises in cervicogenic headache: randomized controlled trial

Effectiveness of Kinaesthetic Exercise program on Position Sense, Pain, and Disability in Chronic Neck Pain Patients with Cervical Spondylosis – A Randomized Comparative Trial

Effects of Integrating Jaw Opening and Closing Movements with Active Neck Exercises in the Management of Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of Cervical Spine Exercise Protocol on Neck Pain, Pericervical Muscle Endurance, and Range of Motion in Medical Students: A Prospective Study

The effect of mind-body exercise on cervical spine mobility of people with neck discomfort: A systemic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Improving Function and Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Neck Pain, Tension-Type Headache, and Forward Head Posture: The Role of Eyeball Exercise and Cervical Stabilization Programs

Traditional Chinese Exercises on Pain and Disability in Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients With Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Alterations in functional connectivity in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain after motor control exercise: a randomized trial

Effect of traditional Chinese exercise combined with massage on pain and disability in patients with lumbar disc herniation: A multi-center, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded clinical trial

The Effects of Cervical Mobilization with Clinical Pilates Exercises on Pain, Muscle Stiffness and Head and Neck Blood Flow in Cervicogenic Headache: Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of Sling-Based Thoracic Active Exercise on Pain and Function and Quality of Life in Female Patients with Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Online Exercise Programs for Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial Reveals Comparable Effects of Global, Local, and Combined Approaches