Influence оf Surface Preparation of Aluminum Alloy AW-5754 аnd Stainless Steel X5CRNI18-10 оn the Properties оf Bonded Joints

Nataša Zdravković,Damjan Klobčar,Dragan Milčić,Matevž Zupančić,Borut Žužek,Miodrag Milčić,Aleksija Đurić

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17112561

IF: 3.4

2024-05-27

Materials

Abstract:Adhesive bonding has proven to be a reliable method of joining materials, and the development of new adhesives has made it possible to use bonding in a variety of applications. This article addresses the challenges of bonding metals such as the aluminum alloy EN AW-5754 and the stainless steel X5CrNi18-10. In this study, the effects of laser cleaning and texturing on the surface properties and strength of two bonded joints were investigated and compared with mechanical preparation (hand sanding with Scotch-Brite and P180 sandpaper). The bonded joints were tested with three different epoxy adhesives. During the tests, the adhesion properties of the bonded surface were determined by measuring the contact angle and assessing the wettability, the surface roughness parameters for the different surface preparations, and the mechanical properties (tensile lap-shear strength). Based on the strength test results, it was found that bonded joints made of stainless steel had 16% to 40% higher strength than aluminum alloys when using the same adhesive and surface preparation. Laser cleaning resulted in maximum shear strength of the aluminum alloy bond, while the most suitable surface preparation for both materials was preparation with P180 sandpaper for all adhesives.

materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry, physical,physics, applied, condensed matter,metallurgy & metallurgical engineering

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems Addressed by the Paper

This paper aims to investigate the effects of different surface treatment methods on the performance of adhesive joints between aluminum alloy EN AW-5754 and stainless steel X5CrNi18-10. Specifically, the paper explores the effectiveness of laser cleaning and texturing compared to traditional mechanical treatments (such as manual sanding with Scotch-Brite and P180 sandpaper) and compares the performance of these treatments with three different epoxy adhesives.

### Main Research Content

1. **Surface Treatment Methods**:
- Laser Cleaning (LC): Using laser to remove surface contaminants.
- Laser Texturing (LT): Creating different textures on the material surface using laser.
- Manual Sanding (Scotch-Brite and P180 sandpaper): Increasing surface roughness through physical methods.

2. **Experimental Design**:
- Conducting adhesive bonding experiments using three different epoxy adhesives.
- Measuring contact angles, analyzing surface roughness, and testing tensile shear strength of samples after different surface treatments.

3. **Results and Discussion**:
- Different surface treatment methods significantly affect bonding strength. Laser cleaning achieves the maximum bonding strength for aluminum alloy.
- For all adhesives, surfaces treated with P180 sandpaper exhibit the best bonding performance.
- The strength of stainless steel adhesive joints is 16% to 40% higher than that of aluminum alloy when using the same adhesive and surface treatment methods.

In summary, this paper focuses on the impact of different surface treatment methods on the performance of adhesive joints between aluminum alloy and stainless steel, and experimentally verifies the optimal surface treatment scheme.