A two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis: causal association between chemokines and pan-carcinoma
Kai Cui,Na Song,Yanwu Fan,Liqun Zeng,Pingyu Shi,Ziwei Wang,Wei Su,Haijun Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1285274
2023-11-23
Abstract:Objective: According to the 2020 data from the World Health Organization (WHO), cancers stand as one of the foremost contributors to global mortality. Revealing novel cancer risk factors and protective factors is of paramount importance in the prevention of disease occurrence. Studies on the relationship between chemokines and cancer are ongoing; however, due to the coordination of multiple potential mechanisms, the specific causal association remains unclear. Methods: We performed a bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis to explore the causal association between serum chemokines and pan-carcinoma. All data is from the GWAS catalog and IEU Open GWAS database. The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method is primarily employed for assessing the statistical significance of the findings. In addition, the significance threshold after the multiple hypothesis test (Bonferroni) was 0.0013, and the evidence of a potential association was considered if the p-value < 0.05, but remained greater than Bonferroni's threshold. Results: The results indicate that CCL1 (odds ratio, OR = 1.18), CCL2 (OR = 1.04), CCL8 (OR = 1.36), CCL14 (Colorectal, OR = 1.08, Small intestine, OR = 0.77, Lung, OR = 1.11), CCL15 (OR = 0.85), CCL18 (Breast, OR = 0.95, Prostate, OR = 0.96), CCL19 (Lung, OR = 0.66, Prostate, OR = 0.92), CCL20 (Lung, OR = 0.53, Thyroid, OR = 0.76), CCL21 (OR = 0.62), CCL22 (OR = 2.05), CCL23 (OR = 1.31), CCL24 (OR = 1.06), CCL27 (OR = 1.49), CCL28 (OR = 0.74), CXCL5 (OR = 0.95), CXCL9 (OR = 3.60), CXCL12 (Breast, OR = 0.87, Small intestine, OR = 0.58), CXCL13 (Breast, OR = 0.93, Lung, OR = 1.29), CXCL14 (Colon, OR = 1.40) and CXCL17 (OR = 1.07) are potential risk factors for cancers. In addition, there was a reverse causal association between CCL1 (OR = 0.94) and CCL18 (OR = 0.94) and breast cancer. Sensitivity analysis results were similar. The results of the other four MR Methods were consistent with the main results, and the leave-one-out method showed that the results were not driven by a Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). Moreover, there was no heterogeneity and pleiotropy in our analysis. Conclusion: Based on the two-sample MR Analysis method, we found that chemokines might be upstream factors of cancer pathogenesis. These results might provide new insights into the future use of chemokines as potential targets for cancer prevention and treatment. Our results also provide important clues for tumor prevention, and changes of serum chemokine concentration may be recognized as one of the features of precancerous lesions in future clinical trials.