Negotiating periodised training programmes in youth soccer development: A social process

Greg Doncaster,Jimmy O’Gorman,Mark Partington,Lee Nelson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2024.2335433

IF: 3.9428

2024-03-31

Journal of Sports Sciences

Abstract:The purpose of the study was to develop new knowledge about the everyday realities when implementing periodised training programmes in professional soccer Academies. Specifically, this project enhances understanding in relation to 1) those stakeholders involved in periodised training programmes in professional soccer Academies, 2) factors that facilitate and constrain the design, implementation, and monitoring of periodised programmes, 3) the extent to which practitioners perceive that education programmes adequately prepared them for this aspect of their work. Academy managers, coaches and sport science support staff were approached to complete an online survey, with 30 individuals (33.6 ± 9.5 years old) agreeing to do so. Findings highlight that practitioners "have" to adapt their practices accordingly in response to contextually constraining factors. Here, the importance of developing richer insights into the social aspects of work in applied settings, greater recognition of facilitating and constraining factors, and an improved awareness and development of the educational interventions that can prepare practitioners in applied practice is emphasised.

sport sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve

This paper aims to explore the practical issues faced when implementing periodic training plans in professional football youth academies. Specifically, the study focuses on the following aspects:

1. **Stakeholders Involved in Periodic Training Plans**: The study examines which stakeholders (such as academy managers, coaches, sports science support staff, etc.) are involved in the design, implementation, and monitoring of periodic training plans.

2. **Facilitating and Constraining Factors**: It investigates which factors facilitate or constrain the process of designing, implementing, and monitoring periodic training plans. These factors include social interactions, organizational culture, and external environment, among others.

3. **Educational Preparedness**: The study examines whether practitioners believe that their educational programs have adequately prepared them to handle these challenges in their actual work.

Through an online survey, the authors collected feedback from 30 practitioners. The study found that practitioners must adjust their practical methods based on the constraints present in the context. Additionally, the research emphasizes the importance of a deep understanding of the social aspects of working in the applied environment, better recognition of facilitating and constraining factors, and increased awareness of educational interventions that can prepare practitioners for practical application.