Abstract:This study introduces the novel construct of bridge-economy partners, which can assist Western firms in learning how to collaborate with local partners when entering unfamiliar foreign countries that have substantially different socioeconomic characteristics. We offer initial empirical evidence regarding the relevance of establishing such interorganizational partnership triads among Western, bridge-economy, and local firms for the entries of Western venture capital firms (VCs) into Mainland China between 1997 and 2008. Venture age, regional legal maturity, and the Western VCs' accumulated local experience are identified as relevant contingency factors for the likelihood of adopting this type of collaboration, which involves partners from three different types of economies. We supplement our quantitative analyses with anecdotal qualitative evidence from interviews with VC executives and fund managers. Executive summary: This study introduces the novel construct of bridge-economy partners and outlines their potentially beneficial roles in the context of foreign-market entry undertaken by Western firms. The established literature suggests that Western firms consider collaboration with a local firm as an accelerator for learning about and adapting to local conditions. However, the substantial socioeconomic differences that may exist between home and host country can create paramount challenges for collaborations between Western firms and their local partners. Adding a third type of partner from a country with substantial socioeconomic overlap to both firms' home countries can help "bridge the socioeconomic gap" between Western and local firms. The bridge economy partners can assist Western firms in learning how to collaborate with their new local partners. This study offers initial empirical evidence for the relevance of such interorganizational partnership triads between Western, bridge-economy, and local firms by using the data of Western venture capital firms (VCs) and their entries into Mainland China between 1997 and 2008. Venture age, regional legal maturity, and accumulated local experience of Western VCs are identified as relevant contingency factors for the likelihood of adopting this type of triadic interorganizational partnership. Quantitative hypothesis tests are supplemented with anecdotal qualitative evidence. Reported findings extend the emerging entrepreneurship literature that focuses on foreign-market entry and globalization. Our focus on triadic partnerships and the role of bridge-economy firms extends the previous research that has instead nearly exclusively focused on dyadic collaborations between Western firms and local partners. A triadic WBL partnership offers an alternative strategy to use when entering foreign markets that have substantially different cultural, economic, and institutional characteristics. Our findings further highlight that even though such triadic WBL partnerships make intuitive sense, successfully implementing such complex collaborations requires minimum levels of accumulated host-country experiences and can benefit from mature legal environments. For policymakers in emerging economies that are interested in supporting foreign investment, the creation of legal environments conducive to forming such triadic WBL collaborations introduces a promising policy option. Beyond these initial key insights, this study also provides guidance for systematic future research into this promising type of collaboration for foreign market entry.

Domestic alliance network to attract foreign partners: Evidence from international joint ventures in China

Alliance Network As a Signal for Foreign Partners

The impact of home business network attributes on Chinese outward foreign direct investment

Relational Embeddedness in Home Country Networks and Multinational Dynamic Capabilities:Evidence from Chinese Firms

Sub-National Institutional Contingencies, Network Positions, And Ijv Partner Selection

Relational Embeddedness in Home-Based Network and Dynamic Capabilities: Evidence from Chinese MNCs

Partnering with foreign businesses: perspectives from Chinese firms

Collaborative and Competitive Forces within Networks and Alliance Formation

When Do Social Network Ties Produce Value: Evidence from VC Industry in China

Untangling the Commonalities and Differences Between Domestic Cross-Regional Experience and International Experience in Shaping Speed of Internationalization

Interorganizational Triads for Foreign-Market Entry: Partnerships among Western, Bridge-Economy, and Local VCs in Mainland China

Why Do Chinese Venture Capitals Invest Jointly? an Analysis of Complex Investment Network

Internationalization of emerging-economy new ventures: The role of within-country differences

Dancing with the stars: what do foreign firms get from high-status local partners?

Governance Structure and the Creation and Protection of Technological Competencies: International R&D Joint Ventures in China

Study on the characteristics of motherland distribution of foreign partner of joint venture in China

How Do an Alliance Firm's Strategic Orientations Drive Its Knowledge Acquisition? Evidence from Sino-foreign Alliance Partnership

Dual-edged Tools of Trade: How International Joint Ventures Help and Hinder Capability Building of Chinese Firms

Local Innovativeness and Knowledge Spillovers of Indigenous Firms on Foreign Firms: Evidence from China's ICT Industry

Formation and performance of multi‐partner joint ventures: a Sino‐foreign illustration

The Effects of Identity and Capability Signals on Alliance Formation