Abstract:Introduction Endometriosis is a chronic disease and the second most common gynaecological condition in the UK, affecting approximately 1.5 million women. It is characterised by the growth of endometrial tissue outside the uterus, causing varying symptoms and having far reaching socioeconomic impacts. We utilise population level hospital admissions data and Census 2011 to examine the characteristics of women diagnosed with endometriosis in England. Methods Using a retrospective cohort design, we used Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) between 2011 and 2021, we linked health data to detailed sociodemographic information from Census 2011, providing individual population-level information on self-reported characteristics. Our outcome of interest was an endometriosis diagnosis in hospital. Our exposures were age on Census Day (five-year age bands), ethnic group, Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) decile, household National Statistics Socio-economic Classification (NS-SEC), highest qualification, country of birth, main language, self-reported general health, self-reported disability, rural/urban classification, region, and upper tier local authority (UTLA). We calculated crude and age-standardised rates, and odds of receiving a diagnosis using logistic regression models adjusted sequentially for age and health. Results Our results highlight differences in underlying prevalence of endometriosis by sociodemographic characteristic, as well as capturing differences in access to services for women receiving a diagnosis of endometriosis in an NHS hospital. The likelihood of receiving an endometriosis diagnosis was highest in the "White British", "Black Caribbean" and "Mixed White and Black Caribbean" ethnic groups, and lowest in the "Chinese", "Arab" and "Black African" ethnic groups. Women living in the most and least deprived areas were least likely to have an endometriosis diagnosis, possibly reflecting lower access to healthcare services in the most deprived group and more use of private healthcare in the least deprived group. Women self-reporting to be in bad health, or disabled, were more likely to have had an endometriosis diagnosis compared those in very good health or non-disabled women, respectively. Conclusions Our results demonstrate significant sociodemographic differences between groups of women receiving an endometriosis diagnosis in England. These results should be used to inform healthcare policies to better support groups of women who are most affected by endometriosis and barriers to receiving a diagnosis. Subsequent work should explore presentations in primary care, as well as the broader socioeconomic ramifications of endometriosis.

Understanding diagnostic delay for endometriosis: A scoping review using the social-ecological framework

Timing, delays and pathways to diagnosis of endometriosis: a scoping review protocol

Time to Diagnose Endometriosis: Current Status, Challenges and Regional Characteristics—A Systematic Literature Review

Diagnostic delay for superficial and deep endometriosis in the United Kingdom

Impact of Endometriosis Diagnostic Delays on Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs

Patient experiences of endometriosis diagnosis: A mixed methods approach

Diagnostic delay for endometriosis in Austria and Germany: causes and possible consequences

A decade to wait: Update on the average delay to diagnosis for endometriosis in Aotearoa New Zealand

Cross-sectional study for derivation of a cut-off value for identification of an early versus delayed diagnosis of endometriosis based on analytical and descriptive research methods

Diagnostic delay in monogenic disease: A scoping review

[Analysis of Characteristics and Influence Factors of Diagnostic Delay of Endometriosis].

Diagnostic Delay of Endometriosis Diagnostic Delay of Endometriosis

Patient perceptions of misdiagnosis of endometriosis: results from an online national survey

Characteristics of women diagnosed with endometriosis in England: a decade of diagnoses, 2011-2021

Delayed diagnosis and treatment of adolescents and young women with suspected endometriosis

Improving the diagnosis of endometriosis in Asia‐Pacific: Consensus from the Asia‐Pacific Endometriosis Expert Panel for Endometriosis

Endometriosis: time to think differently (and together)

The etiquette of endometriosis: Stigmatisation, menstrual concealment and the diagnostic delay

Womens experiences of the diagnostic journey in uterine adenomyosis: a scoping review protocol

Assessing the true prevalence of endometriosis: A narrative review of literature data

Noninvasive diagnostic imaging for endometriosis part 1: a systematic review of recent developments in ultrasound, combination imaging, and artificial intelligence