Multicentre, randomised controlled trial of physiological-based cord clamping versus immediate cord clamping in infants with a congenital diaphragmatic hernia (PinC): statistical analysis plan

Emily J. J. Horn-Oudshoorn,Marijn J. Vermeulen,Ronny Knol,Rebekka Bout-Rebel,Arjan B. te Pas,Stuart B. Hooper,Suzan C. M. Cochius-den Otter,Rene M. H. Wijnen,Kelly J. Crossley,Neysan Rafat,Thomas Schaible,Willem P. de Boode,Anne Debeer,Berndt Urlesberger,Calum T. Roberts,Florian Kipfmueller,Irma Capolupo,Carmen M. Burgos,Bettina E. Hansen,Irwin K. M. Reiss,Philip L. J. DeKoninck
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08027-7
IF: 2.728
2024-03-22
Trials
Abstract:Infants born with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) are at high risk of respiratory insufficiency and pulmonary hypertension. Routine practice includes immediate clamping of the umbilical cord and endotracheal intubation. Experimental animal studies suggest that clamping the umbilical cord guided by physiological changes and after the lungs have been aerated, named physiological-based cord clamping (PBCC), could enhance the fetal-to-neonatal transition in CDH. We describe the statistical analysis plan for the clinical trial evaluating the effects of PBCC versus immediate cord clamping on pulmonary hypertension in infants with CDH (PinC trial).
medicine, research & experimental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?