Abstract:Accuracy and clarity in the names of species are achieved through globally agreed rules: the various international codes of nomenclature. For plants, proposed amendments to these rules 1 are debated during a week-long side meeting of the International Botanical Congress, which is held once every six years — most recently in Madrid in mid-July 2024 (ref. 2 ). Amendments accepted by delegates to that meeting will be included in the next published International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (hereafter, Code ), due in 2025. Three controversial issues were considered at the 2024 International Botanical Congress, two of which focused on addressing ethical issues that arise from historical nomenclature and one of which aimed at future-proofing the type method to ensure that biological nomenclature is able to continue to accurately document and name the Earth's biodiversity. In the end, modest decisions were taken with respect to the first issue, which addressed eponymy — the common practice of naming taxa in honour of significant individuals. Eponyms capture and permanently record noteworthy — and sometimes troubling — aspects of the history and social context of the science of taxonomy. A set of proposals 3 considered by the Madrid meeting provided a mechanism by which problematic eponyms, such as those that honour traders of enslaved persons or colonial administrators who were responsible for genocidal policies and acts, could be retired and replaced by more appropriate and acceptable names. When first published in 2021, these proposals sparked controversy: some argued that they would throw nomenclature into disarray by opening a floodgate of re-namings. By the opening of the Madrid meeting, the proposals had polarized the community. By the end of the meeting, a decision had been reached (the required 60% supermajority had been achieved) to amend the Code to allow the rejection of names that are derogatory to a group or groups of people, but only for names published after 1 January 2026. Although this decision recognizes that derogatory names are unacceptable, the meeting attendees demurred from establishing a way to deal with historical derogatory names. A special committee was established to report to the next meeting (in Cape Town, South Africa, in 2029) on how best to deal with matters of ethics in botanical nomenclature. The committee, once established, has an important but challenging remit — to find an appropriate way forward in a contested space.

Dual nomenclature to be supported explicitly in the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants

Dual nomenclature in organic-walled dinoflagellate cysts I: concepts, methods and applications

Slow progress in mending the laws of botanical nomenclature

The best of both worlds: a proposal for further integration of Candidatus names into the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes

Nomenclature governance of algae, fungi, and plants can become a more democratic process at the Madrid Nomenclature Section

Synopsis of proposals on fungal nomenclature: a review of the proposals concerning Chapter F of the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants submitted to the XII International Mycological Congress, 2024

Dual nomenclature in organic-walled dinoflagellate cysts II: Spiniferites elongatus and S. membranaceus, and their equivalent non-fossil species Gonyaulax ovum comb. nov. and G. lewisiae sp. nov.

A Uniform Gene and Chromosome Nomenclature System for Oat (avena Spp.)

Naming and outline of Dothideomycetes–2014 including proposals for the protection or suppression of generic names

Naming taxa from cladograms: some confusions, misleading statements, and necessary clarifications

A PRELIMINARY COMMENTARY ON PHYLOCODE

Protecting stable biological nomenclatural systems enables universal communication: A collective international appeal

Тaxonomy of Cyanobacteria: The Era of Change

Is the PhyloCode Better Than Linnaean System?

Options and considerations for validation of prokaryotic names under the SeqCode

Tightening the requirements for species diagnoses would help integrate DNA-based descriptions in taxonomic practice

Why and How to Use the SeqCode

On validly published names, correct names, and changes in the nomenclature of phyla and genera of prokaryotes: a guide for the perplexed

Taxonomic Species Recognition Should Be Consistent

Call me by your name: Considerations of DNA sequences as types within wider discussions on fungal nomenclature

The history, systematics, and nomenclature of Thalattosuchia (Archosauria: Crocodylomorpha)