Safeguarding Seniors: Navigating the Intersection of Mental Health and Legal Protections for Geriatric Patients
Robert Esterquest,Erica Garcia Pittman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2024.01.159
IF: 7.996
2024-02-22
American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Abstract:Introduction The complex landscape of Adult Protective Services (APS) involves intricate decision-making processes, particularly in the outpatient setting, where identifying and responding to potential cases of abuse poses unique challenges. The mission of APS is to safeguard older adults and vulnerable individuals from abuse, neglect, and exploitation. Geriatric psychiatrists are in a critical role of identifying abuse. In analysis of APS cases of maltreatment of older adult dementia has been estimated to effect 62% of patients and Major Depressive Disorder in 37%1. Despite the awareness of neglect and mistreatment, these incidents have been inadequately reported, often stemming from factors such as limited provider knowledge, time constraints, or apprehension regarding potential retaliation by the abuser towards the victim 2. Physicians need to carefully weigh the significance of reporting elder abuse, taking into account the need for autonomy, ensuring justice, and considering the potential impact of future APS interventions on the patient's financial independence, personal freedoms, and the dynamics of caregiver relationships. Further complicating matters, the definitions, eligibility requirements, and standards of practice for APS can differ across states and counties. 3. As clinicians grapple with the responsibility to protect their patients, the absence of overt signs of abuse often complicates the decision-making process, prompting a closer examination of when to call APS and the multifaceted dimensions involved in assessing risk in outpatient settings. Methods This case report focuses on a geriatric patient with a mood disorder and neurocognitive disorder with suspicion for elderly abuse, aiming to delineate the critical junctures in geriatric patient care where the involvement of APS becomes imperative, focusing on the intersections of mental health and legal safeguards. Patient's clinical documents in our electronic medical records system were reviewed. A literature review was performed using PubMed database with the search terms of: "Adult Protective Services", "Reporting", and "Geriatric". Results This case report provides an in-depth exploration of the initial assessment, and follow-up of a 77-year-old woman grappling with intricate medical and psychiatric challenges. The patient's medical history includes chronic kidney disease secondary to lithium toxicity, hypothyroidism, hyperparathyroidism (with a parathyroidectomy), and bipolar disorder. Seeking care in the geriatric psychiatry clinic due to an acute on chronic decline in cognitive functioning, the patient presented taking memantine, fluoxetine, and olanzapine. The patient presents in outpatient clinic accompanied by their daughter who is their MPOA and caregiver. Six years ago, the patient faced initial cognitive struggles, particularly in reading and word processing. Despite initial reluctance to a dementia diagnosis, the patient admitted to significant memory lapses. Additionally, conflicting accounts from the caregiver mentioned improved memory post-parathyroidectomy but noted a decline two months before presentation due to a UTI. The MOCA assessment on initial presentation scored 18/30 with significant impairments in attention. The psychiatric interview uncovered historical conflicts between the patient and her caregiver-daughter, marked by the caregiver's decision to relocate the patient two years earlier without specialist consultations, despite the need for multiple psychiatric medications. A recent unclear physical altercation added complexity to their relationship. Financial dependence on the patient's retirement funds by the caregiver was evident, citing full-time care as a reason. Despite safety concerns raised during joint interviews, the patient, when alone, expressed feeling safe at home. The physician, consulting a senior psychiatrist and risk management, refrained from involving Adult Protective Services (APS) due to a threshold not meeting immediate danger criteria. Medication adjustments were recommended, witnessing threats towards the daughter in subsequent weeks. Despite worsening confusion and caregiver actions against medical advice, the provider, considering the nascent patient-provider relationship, opted against APS involvement, aiming to foster trust for future examinations. The decision prioritized continued patient care and the potential for more objective findings in subsequent evaluations. The patient and caregiver later returned to the clinic, providing reassurance that the patient was less likely experiencing abuse. Conclusions In navigating the intricate terrain of elder abuse, this case study underscores the critical -Abstract Truncated-
psychiatry,geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology