Source apportionment of PM2.5 carbonaceous aerosols during a long-lasting winter haze episode in Xiangyang, central China
Huimeng Jiang,Xiaofei Geng,Zhineng Cheng,Lingxi Zhan,Jiao Tang,Jiangtao Li,Han Xiao,He Song,Tao Wang,Jun Li,Gan Zhang,Zuwu Wang,Hairong Cheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2020.12.007
IF: 4.831
2021-02-01
Atmospheric Pollution Research
Abstract:<p>The goal of this study was to identify the relative contribution of fossil and non-fossil contributions to PM<sub>2.5</sub> carbonaceous aerosols (CAs) in PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution events. To achieve this, the pollution characteristics and source apportionments of CAs using radiocarbon (<sup>14</sup>C) and organic tracers (anhydrosugar) were determined during a long-lasting winter haze episode (Jan. 13–24, 2018) in Xiangyang, central China. Non-fossil sources (biofuel, biomass burning, and biogenic emissions) contributed 74 ± 3% and 35 ± 2% to organic carbon (OC, 20.7 ± 6.79 μg/m<sup>3</sup>) and elemental carbon (EC, 6.48 ± 1.79 μg/m<sup>3</sup>), respectively. During the winter haze episode, CAs were derived from primary biofuel and biomass burning-derived OC (POC<sub>bb</sub>, 27.3 ± 4%), secondary biofuel and biomass burning-derived OC (SOC<sub>bb</sub>, 26.7 ± 5%), fossil sources-derived EC (EC<sub>f</sub>, 15.4 ± 3%), secondary fossil sources-derived OC (SOC<sub>f</sub>, 14.7 ± 1%), biofuel and biomass burning-derived EC (EC<sub>bb</sub>, 8.4 ± 2%), primary fossil sources-derived OC (POC<sub>f</sub>, 5.5 ± 1%), and secondary biogenic sources-derived OC (SOC<sub>bio</sub>, 2.0 ± 1%). Biofuel and biomass burning contributed more to PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution compared to traffic exhaust, which indicated that the public and government should pay attention to control biofuel and biomass burning in Xiangyang, central China.</p>
environmental sciences