Comparison of methods for DMSP measurements in dinoflagellate cultures

Amandine M. N. Caruana,Eva Bucciarelli,Céline Deleporte,Emilie Le Floc'h,Fabienne Hervé,Manon Le Goff
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.10618
2024-04-25
Limnology and Oceanography Methods
Abstract:A comparison of three analytical methods (the indirect GC‐FPD and MIMS, and direct LC‐MS/MS) for dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) measurements was conducted to assess their accuracy and reliability. The three methods showed a linear response but are distinguished by their linearity range, the largest being for MIMS. All three methods showed good precision on Alexandrium minutum samples (2–12%). The variability between the three methods when comparing analyses of A. minutum replicates was 11%, with the DMSP measurements by LC‐MS/MS being the highest. This result also confirms that indirect DMSP measurement after hydrolysis for GC or MIMS methods does not lead to an overestimation of DMSP values in A. minutum. A special focus was made on the more recent LC‐MS/MS method including further assays in sample preparation and storage from cultures of the dinoflagellate A. minutum. Dinoflagellate cells should be harvested by gentle filtration (
oceanography,limnology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?