Abstract:The debate on algorithmic collusion has put the hub-and-spoke cartel in the picture. In Japan, a hub-and-spoke cartel, a cartel in which there is a vertical facilitator of horizontal collusion, has long been in existence. Kansei dango, bid-rigging on public procurement projects, have been assisted by bureaucrats. The problem with this kind of cartel was that the Japanese Antimonopoly Act (AMA) is not designed to make the vertical facilitator accountable for its cooperation with the cartel. This resulted in a legislative initiative to deal with the bureaucrats participating in the cartel. A similar evolution has been noticeable in relation to trade associations. This triggers the question of how the AMA can respond to situations in which an algorithm enters the role of facilitator. This contribution argues that an easy answer cannot be given. If the implementation of the algorithm is the result of communication between the enterprises participating in the collusion, the unreasonable restraint provision of the AMA, the provision relevant to price fixing, may be applicable. The only caution that remains is whether the algorithm is implemented at enterprises competing with each other. When an algorithm is able to impose a price on enterprises at another level in the market, and there is thus no communication, even indirectly, between competing enterprises, the Japan Fair Trade Commission may shift to the unfair trade practices provision. More specifically, the unfair trade practice of conditional dealing may apply to a situation in which an algorithm fixes the prices of sellers using the algorithm.

Hub-and-Spoke Collusion with Horizontally Differentiated Spokes

Three (or more) is a magic number: hub & spoke collusion as a way to reduce downstream competition

Collusion to Raise Downstream Prices: Upstream Supplier as Hub

Competition Law and Hub-and-Spoke Collusion

Hub and Spoke Cartels vs. RPM: Differences, Interactions and the Concurrence of Wills’ Theory of Harm

Hub-and-Spoke collusion in the port intelligence investment system: A case study of Shanghai Port

Algorithmic Hub-and-Spoke Cartels: A Japanese Perspective

Hub-and-Spoke Logistics Network Considering Pricing and Co-Opetition

Hub-and-spoke arrangements: future challenges within Article 101 TFEU assessment

Drawing the Boundaries Between Hub-and-Spoke Cartels and Vertical Agreements: Lessons from the United Kingdom and the United States to Chilean Competition Law

Cartel Stability under Quality Differentiation

How Can Downstream Firms Bene t from Upstream Collusion ?

Upstream Collusion and Resale Price Maintenance: An Anatomy of the German Coffee Cartel

How Resale Price Maintenance and Loss Leading affect Upstream Cartel Stability: Anatomy of a Coffee Cartel

Study of the Competition of Location and Pricing between Two Supply Chains Each Consisting of One Manufacture and One Retailer

Firms' R& D Cooperation Behavior in A Supply Chain

Bertrand Vs. Cournot Competition in Distribution Channels with Upstream Collusion

Collusion Between Supply Chains under Asymmetric Information

Cartelization, Cartel Breakdown, and Price Behavior: Evidence from the German Cement Industry

When is Upstream Collusion Profitable?

Distribution Channel Strategies and Retailer Collusion in a Supply Chain with Multiple Retailers