Abstract:There are several forms of maintenance high-efficiency hemodialysis (HD), including hemodiafiltrations (HDF) in different technical modes and expanded HD, using dialyzers with medium cut-off membranes. The aim of the study was to assess the intradialytic tolerance and length of dialysis recovery time (DRT) in these modalities. This is an exploratory, crossover study in maintenance HD patients with low comorbidity and no clinical indications for the use of high-efficiency HD, who were exposed to five intermittent dialyses in random order: high-flux hemodialysis (S-HD), expanded HD (HDx), pre-dilution HDF (PRE-HDF), mix-dilution HDF (MIX-HDF) and post-dilution HDF (POST-HDF). Twenty-four dialysis sessions of each method were included in the analysis. Dialysis parameters, including blood flow rate, dialysis fluid flow rate and temperature, and pharmacological treatment were constant. Average total convection volume for post-HDF, pre-HDF and mix-HDF were 25.6 (3.8), 61.5 (7.2) and 47.1 (11.4) L, respectively. During all therapies, patients were monitored for the similarity of their hydration statuses using bioimpedance spectroscopy, and for similar variability over time in systemic blood pressure and cardiac output, while peripheral resistance was monitored using impedance cardiography. The lowest frequency of all intradialytic adverse events were observed during HDx. Delayed DRT was the shortest during PRE-HDF. Patients were also more likely to report immediate recovery while receiving PRE-HDF. These differences did not reach statistical significance; however, the study results suggest that intradialytic tolerance and DRT may depend on the dialysis method used. This supports the need of taking into account patient preferences and quality of life while individualizing high-efficiency therapy in HD patients.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is what the differences are in patients' tolerance during dialysis and recovery time in different high - efficiency hemodialysis modes. Specifically, the study aims to evaluate the changes in patients' intradialysis tolerance and post - dialysis recovery time (DRT) under several high - efficiency hemodialysis (HD) modes, including different technical modes of hemodiafiltration (HDF) and extended hemodialysis (HDx). ### Research Background - **Standard High - Flux Hemodialysis (S - HD)**: The current standard method for chronic dialysis treatment, which has replaced dialysis based on low - flux membranes. - **High - Efficiency Dialysis Therapies**: With significant technological advances in dialyzer membrane permeability and ultrafiltration control systems, these therapies can more effectively remove large and medium - molecular - weight water - soluble toxins. - **Different High - Efficiency Dialysis Modes**: - Pre - dilution HDF (PRE - HDF) - Post - dilution HDF (POST - HDF) - Mixed - dilution HDF (MIX - HDF) - Extended Hemodialysis (HDx) ### Research Objectives - **Evaluate Intradialysis Tolerance**: Observe the frequency of adverse events in patients under different dialysis modes. - **Evaluate Post - Dialysis Recovery Time (DRT)**: Record the time required for patients to return to normal function from the end of dialysis. ### Research Design - **Cross - over Study**: 12 maintenance hemodialysis patients (with low comorbidities and no clinical indication for high - efficiency dialysis) were randomly assigned to receive five dialysis modes: S - HD, HDx, PRE - HDF, MIX - HDF, and POST - HDF. - **Each mode was performed three times for dialysis**, and the data from the second and third dialyses were used for the final analysis. ### Main Results - **Adverse Events**: There was no symptomatic intradialysis hypotension during all treatment processes. The incidence of adverse events was the lowest in the HDx group (25%), but the difference was not statistically significant. - **Post - Dialysis Recovery Time (DRT)**: The PRE - HDF group had the shortest delayed DRT, and the highest proportion of patients reported immediate recovery (62.5%), but the difference did not reach statistical significance. ### Discussion - **CONVINCE Trial**: It provided strong evidence for the first time that high - volume POST - HDF improves survival rate compared with high - flux HD. - **Treatment Options for Patients with Low Comorbidities**: For patients with low comorbidities and a transplantation prospect, whether it is worthwhile to use high - efficiency dialysis therapies and which therapy is the most tolerated by patients still need further research. - **Quality of Life**: In addition to the survival rate, patients' dialysis tolerance and quality of life should also be regarded as important factors in treatment decisions. ### Conclusion The results of this study indicate that different high - efficiency dialysis modes may have an impact on patients' intradialysis tolerance and recovery time, supporting the consideration of patient preferences and quality of life when formulating personalized high - efficiency dialysis treatment plans.

Intradialytic Tolerance and Recovery Time in Different High-Efficiency Hemodialysis Modalities

[Effects of Interim Hemodialysis on Survival and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Maintenance Peritoneal Dialysis].

Intradialytic exercise in hemodialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Reproducibility of Heart Rate Variability Revealed by Repeated Measurements during and after Hemodialysis

Hemodialysis or Peritoneal Dialysis, Which Is Better for Patients with Delayed Graft Function?

Hemodialysis Procedures for Stable Incident and Prevalent Patients Optimize Hemodynamic Stability, Dialysis Dose, Electrolytes, and Fluid Balance

Intradialytic cardiovascular injury is lowest in high-volume haemodiafiltration: a randomized cross-over trial in four intermittent dialysis strategies

Efficiency and nutritional parameters in an elderly high risk population on hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration in Italy and France: different treatments with similar names?

Primary Clinical Experience in High Risk Uremic Patients Converted from Conventional to Short Daily Hemodialysis

Online Hemodiafiltration: A New Perspective for Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease

Preservation of Residual Renal Function with Limited Water Removal in Hemodialysis Patients

Effect of Intradialytic Exercise on Physical Performance and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Patients Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Pilot and Feasibility Study

Interaction between intradialytic exercise and hemodialysis adequacy

The Protective Effect of Different Dialysis Types on Residual Renal Function in Patients with Maintenance Hemodialysis A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Acute Effects of Hemodiafiltration Versus Conventional Hemodialysis on Endothelial Function and Inflammation: A Randomized Crossover Study.

Different interdialytic intervals and cardiorespiratory fitness in patients undergoing hemodialysis

The effect of low-intensity intradialytic aerobic exercise on heart rate variability in maintenance hemodialysis patients

Longitudinal Trends in Quality of Life and Physical Function in Frail Older Dialysis Patients: A Comparison of Assisted Peritoneal Dialysis and In-Center Hemodialysis

Expanded Hemodialysis Enhancement in Middle Molecule Clearance for Patients With Low Blood Flow Rates of Tunneled Dialysis Catheters

Modifiable Factors Associated with Prolonged Dialysis Recovery Time and Fatigue in Hemodialysis Patients

Predicting intradialytic hypotension in critically ill patients undergoing intermittent hemodialysis: a prospective observational study