Abstract:Spray-drying and freeze-drying are indispensable techniques for microencapsulating biologically active compounds, crucial for enhancing their bioavailability and stability while protecting them from environmental degradation. This study evaluates the effectiveness of these methods in encapsulating Citrus x paradisi L. (grapefruit) peel extract, focusing on sustainable recovery from waste peels. Key objectives included identifying optimal wall materials and assessing each encapsulation technique's impact on microencapsulation. The investigation highlighted that the choice of wall material composition significantly affects the microencapsulation's efficiency and morphological characteristics. A wall material mixture of 17 g maltodextrin, 0.5 g carboxymethylcellulose, and 2.5 g β-cyclodextrin was optimal for spray drying. This combination resulted in a sample with a wettability time of 1170 (s), a high encapsulation efficiency of 91.41%, a solubility of 60.21%, and a low moisture content of 5.1 ± 0.255%. These properties indicate that spray-drying, particularly with this specific wall material composition, offers a durable structure and can be conducive to prolonged release. Conversely, varying the precise compositions used in the freeze-drying process yielded different results: quick wettability at 132.6 (s), a solubility profile of 61.58%, a moisture content of 5.07%, and a high encapsulation efficiency of 78.38%. The use of the lyophilization technique with this latter wall material formula resulted in a more porous structure, which may facilitate a more immediate release of encapsulated compounds and lower encapsulation efficiency.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to efficiently and sustainably recover bioactive compounds from grapefruit peel (*Citrus x paradisi L.*) through two microencapsulation techniques, spray - drying and freeze - drying. Specifically, the research aims to: 1. **Optimize the selection of wall materials**: Evaluate the influence of different wall material combinations on the microencapsulation effect, especially determine the optimal wall material formula. 2. **Compare the effects of the two drying techniques**: Analyze the advantages and disadvantages of spray - drying and freeze - drying in the microencapsulation process, including their influence on the physicochemical properties of microcapsules (such as wettability, solubility, moisture content, encapsulation efficiency, etc.). 3. **Improve powder quality and encapsulation efficiency**: By optimizing process parameters (such as temperature, flow rate, etc.), enhance the quality of the final product and the stability and controlled - release characteristics of its bioactive components. ### Research Background Grapefruit peel is rich in bioactive compounds, such as flavonoids (naringin and naringenin), and these compounds have multiple health - promoting effects. However, due to the limited solubility, bioavailability and stability of these compounds, their practical applications are restricted. Microencapsulation technology can improve the stability and bioavailability of these active ingredients by protecting them from environmental influences. ### Research Methods - **Material Preparation**: Use a 50% ethanol solution to extract bioactive components from grapefruit peel, and carry out ultrasonic extraction, centrifugation and filtration. - **Microcapsule Preparation**: Conduct spray - drying and freeze - drying experiments with different wall material combinations (such as maltodextrin, skim milk powder, β - cyclodextrin and carboxymethyl cellulose). - **Performance Evaluation**: Evaluate the quality of microcapsules under different conditions by measuring indicators such as moisture content, wettability, solubility, yield, encapsulation efficiency and morphological characteristics. ### Main Findings - **The optimal wall material combination for spray - drying**: The wall material composed of 17 g maltodextrin, 0.5 g carboxymethyl cellulose and 2.5 g β - cyclodextrin shows the highest encapsulation efficiency (91.41%), good solubility (60.21%) and low moisture content (5.1 ± 0.255%) at an inlet air temperature of 160 °C and an outlet air temperature of 80 °C. - **Characteristics of freeze - drying**: Although the encapsulation efficiency is slightly lower (78.38%), the freeze - dried product has faster wettability (132.6 s) and higher solubility (61.58%), and its structure is more porous, which is conducive to the rapid release of active ingredients. In conclusion, this research provides a scientific basis for selecting appropriate microencapsulation techniques and wall materials, which is helpful for improving the efficiency and sustainability of recovering bioactive compounds from waste.

Optimizing Encapsulation: Comparative Analysis of Spray-Drying and Freeze-Drying for Sustainable Recovery of Bioactive Compounds from Citrus x paradisi L. Peels

Encapsulation of Citrus By-Product Extracts by Spray-Drying and Freeze-Drying Using Combinations of Maltodextrin with Soybean Protein and ι-Carrageenan

Enhancing Antioxidant Retention through Varied Wall Material Combinations in Grape Spray Drying and Storage

Effect of Type and Concentration of Carrier Material on the Encapsulation of Pomegranate Peel Using Spray Drying Method

Wall Materials for Encapsulating Bioactive Compounds via Spray-Drying: A Review

Choosing the appropriate wall materials for spray-drying microencapsulation of natural bioactive ingredients: Taking phenolic compounds as examples

Spray-Drying Microencapsulation of Bioactive Compounds from Lemon Verbena Green Extract

Optimisation of the Encapsulation of Grape Pomace Extract by Spray Drying Using Goat Whey Protein as a Coating Material

Microencapsulation by spray-drying and freeze-drying of extract of phenolic compounds obtained from ciriguela peel

Spray dried powder of common fruit juices: Enhancement of main properties

A Comparison of Microfluidic-Jet Spray Drying, Two-Fluid Nozzle Spray Drying, and Freeze-Drying for Co-Encapsulating β-Carotene, Lutein, Zeaxanthin, and Fish Oil

Effects of the spray-drying process using maltodextrin on bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of the pulp of the tropical fruit açai (Euterpe oleracea Mart.)

Encapsulation of Extract from Unused Chokeberries by Spray Drying, Co-crystallization, and Ionic Gelation

Encapsulation and delivery of bioactive compounds using spray and freeze-drying techniques: A review

Optimization and Encapsulation of Phenolic Compounds Extracted from Maize Waste by Freeze-Drying, Spray-Drying, and Microwave-Drying Using Maltodextrin

Freeze-Drying Technique for Microencapsulation of Elsholtzia ciliata Ethanolic Extract Using Different Coating Materials

Polysaccharides as Carriers of Polyphenols: Comparison of Freeze-Drying and Spray-Drying as Encapsulation Techniques

Citrus × paradisi L. Fruit Waste: The Impact of Eco-Friendly Extraction Techniques on the Phytochemical and Antioxidant Potential

Microencapsulation of Bioactive Compounds from Blackberry Pomace (Rubus fruticosus) by Spray Drying Technique

The Impact of Freeze-Drying Conditions on the Physico-Chemical Properties and Bioactive Compounds of a Freeze-Dried Orange Puree

Acerola byproducts microencapsulated by spray and freeze-drying: the effect of carrier agent and drying method on the production of bioactive powder